Talk:Bulgaria

From Hattrick

моля, без вандализъм! зачитайте добрия дух на едно уики. ако имате мнение, напишете статия за темата на спора и представете двете гледни точки. ::: in English: if you have an opinion, please, don't express it by altering other people's complete edits. as long as the information in the article is neutral and well formed, leave it as it is and write another article about the argument you want to discuss and the two sides in it, including yours. --Cryout 21:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

You'd do best to do the same as opposed to presenting fiction as facts and deleting facts because you do not like them. Besides, learn English grammar and spelling. Feanor (trying, as always, to backtrack cryout and correct his intentional errors)

If there are grammatical or factual errors, sorry to the community. If I have used double spelling and am now excusing myself for this, sorry to myself. Then, I am really trying to clarify the facts. I did leave a sentence for which it is dubious how much it relates to real world events just, because I am willing to present both sides of an argument. Hope you will learn to discern between facts and your own opinion. Until then, I will be making the only intentional mistake: to discuss facts when I can see that the other is not ready to listen. P.S. ако ще отправяме напдаки, нека поне се придържаме към българския и да не грозим нещо толкова готино като уики. --Cryout 22:15, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Ne otpravqm nikakvi napadki, a za poreden pyt ti opravqm prostotiite. Napravo ti se chudq kak ne si otishyl oshte v PR otdela na Microsoft. A ako ne ti haresva moeto mnenie po nqkoi vyprosi, mojesh da se otnesesh kym global GMs, koito go prevyrnaha vyv fakt predi vreme.

Please, please, please, don't include irrelevant facts just to prove a point! A Wiki's articles are NOT the place to prove points. I will leave your last change uneditted for now. I ask the community to read through them and comment. An example is the fact that a founder of website (NB not hattrick.org) was kicked out of the game for alleged cheating. Few people care. --Cryout 22:26, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Having in mind that the sentence in question is a part of the description of the site in question, it is hardly irrelevant. Again, please check your spelling and grammar, these are supposed to be official documents. The noun is "advice" and the past tense of edit is "edited."

Simply putting additional words to a definition does not make these words relevant. No matter who writes them. Grammer is grammer, neutrality is important. --Cryout 22:44, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

It is a very useful bit of information that you do not like. It is also absolutely in line with the purpose of a wiki. Neutrality is important, and hiding facts is as biased as making up facts. You are (were before my editing) guilty of both. Learn your grammer and spelling, it is a shame.

Being taght by you what is a shame is unacceptable. Do not accuse me of being biased, because I am not. Do nt accuse my writing of being biased, because it is not. Do not attack my grammar, even when you have nothing else to say. And because I really want to see what other people think, I will stop the discussion for today. --Cryout 23:11, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Once again I realize it is useless to argue with an eloquent (but semi-literate) bigot who escapes to using phrases that are as grand as they are empty when challenged. I do have other things to say and I said them (despite your prophetic words, I admit), it is you who did not comment on them :)

I am sorry for you. I will do myself the favour to not talk to you anymore. Empty words? Yeah, at least I will always be able to laugh at you one more time. This has become more personal than it is acceptable for me and so I will go on and work on articles you (hopefully) will not have a reason to destroy. ~ Cryout