https://wiki.hattrick.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=68.190.125.81 2026-09-17T19:55:31Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.43.9 https://wiki.hattrick.org/index.php?title=Talk:Match_of_the_Season&diff=56262 2007-05-04T05:52:16Z

<p>68.190.125.81: </p> <hr /> <div>Just a bit of grammer changes and formatting.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> I prefer MotS over MOTS, do more people agree? --[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 15:40, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> I'm agree, as do I prefer PiC over PIC --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 15:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> I disagree, but I'm not disagree ;) I prefer MOTS and PIC -- [[User:Mightyzug|Mightyzug]]<br /> ----<br /> <br /> <br /> I've rephrased everything. Examples are confusing, and we should stick to a formal, easy to understand explanation. MotS is a possibility, of course, but I wouldn't use it as I've never actually seen people write that. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 15:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> Fine by me...I used a bit of inertia from the post before, but you made it much clearer. [OgtheDim]<br /> <br /> <br /> I kind of disagree with LA-Motto's last changes. The examples will possibly lead people to believe that there's a less than one level increase in midfield rating (midfield level? what do we do with that?), and in fact, it's wrong. Even with flat-solid midfield (7.00), a MOTS would increase it to very low excellent (8.05). --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 15:58, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> <br /> I have kind of reverted back the changes. The explanation of how exactly TS influences midfield, what the default value is, etc, are left for a separate article on TS. This one deals with MOTS. However, I have added a remark that TS relates to midfield. If you insist on examples, don't mix them with this part of the article, but add headings and separate the content. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 16:14, 26 November 2005 (UTC)</div>

68.190.125.81 https://wiki.hattrick.org/index.php?title=Talk:Match_of_the_Season&diff=56261 2007-05-04T05:51:36Z

<p>68.190.125.81: </p> <hr /> <div>Just a bit of grammer changes and formatting.<br /> <br /> I disagree, but I'm not disagree ;) I prefer MOTS and PIC -- [[User:Mightyzug|Mightyzug]]<br /> <br /> I prefer MotS over MOTS, do more people agree? --[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 15:40, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> I'm agree, as do I prefer PiC over PIC --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 15:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> I've rephrased everything. Examples are confusing, and we should stick to a formal, easy to understand explanation. MotS is a possibility, of course, but I wouldn't use it as I've never actually seen people write that. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 15:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> Fine by me...I used a bit of inertia from the post before, but you made it much clearer. [OgtheDim]<br /> <br /> <br /> I kind of disagree with LA-Motto's last changes. The examples will possibly lead people to believe that there's a less than one level increase in midfield rating (midfield level? what do we do with that?), and in fact, it's wrong. Even with flat-solid midfield (7.00), a MOTS would increase it to very low excellent (8.05). --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 15:58, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> <br /> I have kind of reverted back the changes. The explanation of how exactly TS influences midfield, what the default value is, etc, are left for a separate article on TS. This one deals with MOTS. However, I have added a remark that TS relates to midfield. If you insist on examples, don't mix them with this part of the article, but add headings and separate the content. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 16:14, 26 November 2005 (UTC)</div>

68.190.125.81 https://wiki.hattrick.org/index.php?title=Talk:Match_of_the_Season&diff=56260 2007-05-04T05:50:52Z

<p>68.190.125.81: </p> <hr /> <div>Just a bit of grammer changes and formatting.<br /> <br /> I disagree, but I'm not disagree ;) I prefer MOTS and PIC -- [User:Mightyzug]<br /> <br /> I prefer MotS over MOTS, do more people agree? --[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 15:40, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> I'm agree, as do I prefer PiC over PIC --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 15:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> I've rephrased everything. Examples are confusing, and we should stick to a formal, easy to understand explanation. MotS is a possibility, of course, but I wouldn't use it as I've never actually seen people write that. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 15:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> Fine by me...I used a bit of inertia from the post before, but you made it much clearer. [OgtheDim]<br /> <br /> <br /> I kind of disagree with LA-Motto's last changes. The examples will possibly lead people to believe that there's a less than one level increase in midfield rating (midfield level? what do we do with that?), and in fact, it's wrong. Even with flat-solid midfield (7.00), a MOTS would increase it to very low excellent (8.05). --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 15:58, 26 November 2005 (UTC)<br /> <br /> <br /> I have kind of reverted back the changes. The explanation of how exactly TS influences midfield, what the default value is, etc, are left for a separate article on TS. This one deals with MOTS. However, I have added a remark that TS relates to midfield. If you insist on examples, don't mix them with this part of the article, but add headings and separate the content. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 16:14, 26 November 2005 (UTC)</div>

68.190.125.81