Category talk:Newbie Tips - Revision history

194.228.235.230: /* wtf? */

2007-07-24T08:20:34Z

wtf?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 24 July 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Is it appropriate to have this amount of content on a category page? We've already got at least a couple of newbie guide articles already, in the two ten principle approach pages. And that's not even getting into content issues -- setting aside matters of opinion, this content was clearly written before the current "certificate" program was put in place, because it doesn't mention basics like not being able to change your formation immediately. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 21:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)		:Is it appropriate to have this amount of content on a category page? We've already got at least a couple of newbie guide articles already, in the two ten principle approach pages. And that's not even getting into content issues -- setting aside matters of opinion, this content was clearly written before the current "certificate" program was put in place, because it doesn't mention basics like not being able to change your formation immediately. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 21:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

	~~== wtf? ==~~

	~~''Any player with inad mainskill, (unless an experienced player) should be fired, and you should sell any players who have solid mainskill.''~~

	~~So newbies are supposed to play '''only''' with players who have passable mainskill? Who can wrote such a bullshit?~~

194.228.235.230: wtf?

2007-07-24T08:18:31Z

wtf?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:18, 24 July 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Is it appropriate to have this amount of content on a category page? We've already got at least a couple of newbie guide articles already, in the two ten principle approach pages. And that's not even getting into content issues -- setting aside matters of opinion, this content was clearly written before the current "certificate" program was put in place, because it doesn't mention basics like not being able to change your formation immediately. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 21:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)		:Is it appropriate to have this amount of content on a category page? We've already got at least a couple of newbie guide articles already, in the two ten principle approach pages. And that's not even getting into content issues -- setting aside matters of opinion, this content was clearly written before the current "certificate" program was put in place, because it doesn't mention basics like not being able to change your formation immediately. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 21:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

			== wtf? ==

			''Any player with inad mainskill, (unless an experienced player) should be fired, and you should sell any players who have solid mainskill.''

			So newbies are supposed to play '''only''' with players who have passable mainskill? Who can wrote such a bullshit?

Mr Wednesday at 21:50, 6 September 2006

2006-09-06T21:50:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 6 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I fixed a lot of formatting errors and typos; I also added the based_on_opinion template, since what was written is largely opinion. If anyone notices this same article somewhere else originating before the original date of this large article (today), delete this content immediately. While I disagree with some of the points made, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea to start an edit battle. So in the interest of keeping the peace, if anyone wants to make changes to the content (non-minor edits), here's the place to do it. [[User:Kc-jake\|-- Jake]] 18:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)		I fixed a lot of formatting errors and typos; I also added the based_on_opinion template, since what was written is largely opinion. If anyone notices this same article somewhere else originating before the original date of this large article (today), delete this content immediately. While I disagree with some of the points made, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea to start an edit battle. So in the interest of keeping the peace, if anyone wants to make changes to the content (non-minor edits), here's the place to do it. [[User:Kc-jake\|-- Jake]] 18:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

			:Is it appropriate to have this amount of content on a category page? We've already got at least a couple of newbie guide articles already, in the two ten principle approach pages. And that's not even getting into content issues -- setting aside matters of opinion, this content was clearly written before the current "certificate" program was put in place, because it doesn't mention basics like not being able to change your formation immediately. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 21:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Kc-jake at 18:20, 6 September 2006

2006-09-06T18:20:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 6 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I fixed a lot of formatting errors and typos; I also added the based_on_opinion template, since what was written is largely opinion. If anyone notices this same article somewhere else originating before the original date of this large article (today), delete this content immediately. While I disagree with some of the points made, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea to start an edit battle. So in the interest of keeping the peace, if anyone wants to make changes to the content (non-minor edits), here's the place to do it.		I fixed a lot of formatting errors and typos; I also added the based_on_opinion template, since what was written is largely opinion. If anyone notices this same article somewhere else originating before the original date of this large article (today), delete this content immediately. While I disagree with some of the points made, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea to start an edit battle. So in the interest of keeping the peace, if anyone wants to make changes to the content (non-minor edits), here's the place to do it. [[User:Kc-jake\|-- Jake]] 18:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Kc-jake at 18:20, 6 September 2006

2006-09-06T18:20:23Z

New page

I fixed a lot of formatting errors and typos; I also added the based_on_opinion template, since what was written is largely opinion. If anyone notices this same article somewhere else originating before the original date of this large article (today), delete this content immediately. While I disagree with some of the points made, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea to start an edit battle. So in the interest of keeping the peace, if anyone wants to make changes to the content (non-minor edits), here's the place to do it.