Offensive winger - Revision history

Dzsoo at 15:14, 17 May 2012

2012-05-17T15:14:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 17 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Interwiki/Offensive winger}}
	An Offensive Winger is the greatest contributor by far to the wing attack rating.		An Offensive Winger is the greatest contributor by far to the wing attack rating.

Nightwish: links

2009-04-29T20:22:16Z

links

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 29 April 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	An Offensive Winger uses both their [[passing]] and their [[wing]] skill to generate attack strength.		An Offensive Winger uses both their [[passing]] and their [[wing]] skill to generate attack strength.

	Like [[Normal ~~Winger~~]]s and [[Defensive ~~Winger~~]]s, they contribute 50% of their [[Playmaking]] skill to the midfield rating.		Like [[Normal winger]]s and [[Defensive winger]]s, they contribute 50% of their [[Playmaking]] skill to the midfield rating.

Nightwish: Offensive Winger moved to Offensive winger

2009-04-29T20:01:53Z

Offensive Winger moved to Offensive winger

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:01, 29 April 2009
(No difference)

202.81.30.16: /* The Value of Secondaries */

2006-09-07T03:38:05Z

The Value of Secondaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 7 September 2006
Line 68:		Line 68:
	Passing: If your team has hit a wage ceiling for a winger, you can get more wing attack for very little money by having an offensive winger with generous passing. This can save a big team a lot of money.		Passing: If your team has hit a wage ceiling for a winger, you can get more wing attack for very little money by having an offensive winger with generous passing. This can save a big team a lot of money.

	Playmaking: Everyone wants more ~~posession~~, but when salaries of IMs start to get too high, the PM contribution of a skilled Offensive Winger is of great help, on the pitch and in the pocketbook.		Playmaking: Everyone wants more possession, but when salaries of IMs start to get too high, the PM contribution of a skilled Offensive Winger is of great help, on the pitch and in the pocketbook.

	== Federations ==		== Federations ==

Mr Wednesday: Linked to rules, reformatted attack contributions so that they make sense

2006-04-21T18:28:02Z

Linked to rules, reformatted attack contributions so that they make sense

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 21 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	An Offensive Winger is the greatest contributor by far to the wing attack rating.		An Offensive Winger is the greatest contributor by far to the wing attack rating.

	From the rules:		From the [[Rules#What abilities really mean\|rules]]:

	''Attack Left wing''		''Attack Left wing''
	'''Winger left winger'''		:'''Winger left winger'''
	''Scoring forwards''		:''Scoring forwards''
	'''Passing left winger'''		:'''Passing left winger'''
	''Passing left inner midfielder		:''Passing left inner midfielder
	Winger left wing back''		:Winger left wing back''

	An Offensive Winger uses both their [[passing]] and their [[wing]] skill to generate attack strength.		An Offensive Winger uses both their [[passing]] and their [[wing]] skill to generate attack strength.

218.175.153.251 at 15:34, 21 April 2006

2006-04-21T15:34:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 21 April 2006
Line 70:		Line 70:
	Playmaking: Everyone wants more posession, but when salaries of IMs start to get too high, the PM contribution of a skilled Offensive Winger is of great help, on the pitch and in the pocketbook.		Playmaking: Everyone wants more posession, but when salaries of IMs start to get too high, the PM contribution of a skilled Offensive Winger is of great help, on the pitch and in the pocketbook.

			== Federations ==
			* [[Wing - Market & Discussion]] (1100+ members)

	[[Category:Player positions]]		[[Category:Player positions]]

218.175.154.18: /* The $$$ Value of Secondaries */

2006-04-06T06:42:34Z

The $$$ Value of Secondaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 6 April 2006
Line 60:		Line 60:


	==The ~~$$$~~ Value of Secondaries==		==The Value of Secondaries==

	Teams that are higher-up the food chain and are having to budget their salaries wisely, can look to secondaries on their Offensive Wingers to help keep costs down.		Teams that are higher-up the food chain and are having to budget their salaries wisely, can look to secondaries on their Offensive Wingers to help keep costs down.

218.175.154.18: /* Playmaking or Passing? */

2006-04-05T17:18:12Z

Playmaking or Passing?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Playmaking or Passing? ==
+An Offensive Winger is the greatest contributor by far to the wing attack rating.
-[[Playmaking]] and [[Passing]] are good secondaries for an offensive winger.
+From the rules:
-'''Passing''' adds to your wing attack rating (not to the middle). There is a rule of thumb that states that about 3-4 levels of passing = 1 level of wing skill.
+''Attack Left wing''
-Wingers are modest midfielders too &mdash; when they are played offensive, defensive and normal, they use 50% of their '''Playmaking''' skill (along with their stamina of course).
+An Offensive Winger uses both their [[passing]] and their [[wing]] skill to generate attack strength.
-'''[[Defending]]''' could be a consideration when played normal or defensive, but a winger played offensive has their defense reduced a lot and their wing skill increased, so for an offensive winger, it's not worth paying for.
+Like [[Normal Winger]]s and [[Defensive Winger]]s, they contribute 50% of their [[Playmaking]] skill to the midfield rating.
-If you plan to play AOW, then passing could help your rating while at the same time helping your wing attack.
+= Secondaries =
-Now,
+Wing skill is by far the most important skill for an Offensive Winger. However, Offensive Wingers also use their Playmaking, Passing and Defense skills too.
-However,
+== Passing ==
-If defence is a concern, then having some PM on your offensive winger becomes very attractive. Increased possession reduces the need for defense on your team overall.
 [[Category:Player positions]]

218.175.148.145 at 04:26, 13 March 2006

2006-03-13T04:26:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 13 March 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[Playmaking]] and [[Passing]] are good secondaries for an offensive winger.		[[Playmaking]] and [[Passing]] are good secondaries for an offensive winger.

	'''[[Passing]]''' adds to your wing attack rating (not to the middle). There is a rule of thumb that states that about 3-4 levels of passing = 1 level of wing skill.		'''Passing''' adds to your wing attack rating (not to the middle). There is a rule of thumb that states that about 3-4 levels of passing = 1 level of wing skill.

	Wingers are modest midfielders too — when they are played offensive, defensive and normal, they use 50% of their '''[[Playmaking]]''' skill (along with their stamina of course).		Wingers are modest midfielders too — when they are played offensive, defensive and normal, they use 50% of their '''Playmaking''' skill (along with their stamina of course).

	'''[[Defending]]''' could be a consideration when played normal or defensive, but a winger played offensive has their defense reduced a lot and their wing skill increased, so for an offensive winger, it's not worth paying for.		'''[[Defending]]''' could be a consideration when played normal or defensive, but a winger played offensive has their defense reduced a lot and their wing skill increased, so for an offensive winger, it's not worth paying for.

218.175.148.145 at 04:25, 13 March 2006

2006-03-13T04:25:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:25, 13 March 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[Playmaking]] and [[Passing]] are good secondaries for an offensive winger.		[[Playmaking]] and [[Passing]] are good secondaries for an offensive winger.

	'''Passing''' adds to your wing attack rating (not to the middle). There is a rule of thumb that states that about 3-4 levels of passing = 1 level of wing skill.		'''[[Passing]]''' adds to your wing attack rating (not to the middle). There is a rule of thumb that states that about 3-4 levels of passing = 1 level of wing skill.

	Wingers are modest midfielders too — when they are played offensive, defensive and normal, they use 50% of their '''Playmaking''' skill (along with their stamina of course).		Wingers are modest midfielders too — when they are played offensive, defensive and normal, they use 50% of their '''[[Playmaking]]''' skill (along with their stamina of course).

	'''[[Defending]]''' could be a consideration when played normal or defensive, but a winger played offensive has their defense reduced a lot and their wing skill increased, so for an offensive winger, it's not worth paying for.		'''[[Defending]]''' could be a consideration when played normal or defensive, but a winger played offensive has their defense reduced a lot and their wing skill increased, so for an offensive winger, it's not worth paying for.
Line 29:		Line 29:

	If you are higher up the food chain and where salaries on your IMs are very high, then having PM on your wingers can be an inexpensive way to help your midfield further.		If you are higher up the food chain and where salaries on your IMs are very high, then having PM on your wingers can be an inexpensive way to help your midfield further.


	~~{{stub}}~~

	[[Category:Player positions]]		[[Category:Player positions]]