Talk:Helper application - Revision history

EchoMan: wrong article :)

2009-08-16T07:48:17Z

wrong article :)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 16 August 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Why?		Why?

	~~==Lock Request==~~
	Since this page is the target of bot vandalism, why don't we lock it? It's just a redirect page anyways and not prone to changes. If not can someone please ban the account that has done the 7 last vandalisms or something like that? --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 07:47, August 16, 2009 (UTC)

2009-08-16T07:47:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:47, 16 August 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Why?		Why?

			==Lock Request==
			Since this page is the target of bot vandalism, why don't we lock it? It's just a redirect page anyways and not prone to changes. If not can someone please ban the account that has done the 7 last vandalisms or something like that? --[[User:EchoMan\|EchoMan]] 07:47, August 16, 2009 (UTC)

2009-01-04T19:57:32Z

Talk:Helper Applications moved to Talk:Helper application

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:57, 4 January 2009
(No difference)

2005-12-14T14:22:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 14 December 2005
Line 23:		Line 23:

	How about we remove the "Freeware" spam and add some text saying "all applications are freeware, unless stated otherwise"? --[[User:Catalyst2950\|Catalyst2950]] 13:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)		How about we remove the "Freeware" spam and add some text saying "all applications are freeware, unless stated otherwise"? --[[User:Catalyst2950\|Catalyst2950]] 13:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

			Why?

2005-12-10T13:54:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:54, 10 December 2005
Line 19:		Line 19:

	- Orestes		- Orestes

			----

			How about we remove the "Freeware" spam and add some text saying "all applications are freeware, unless stated otherwise"? --[[User:Catalyst2950\|Catalyst2950]] 13:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

2005-11-30T03:04:46Z

Wiki Pages.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:04, 30 November 2005
Line 15:		Line 15:

	We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page, as that seems like a double up		We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page, as that seems like a double up

			that said, why do we need to double up on descriptions that are allready provided on the external links.

	- Orestes		- Orestes

2005-11-30T02:59:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:59, 30 November 2005
Line 14:		Line 14:
	----		----

	We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page.		We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page, as that seems like a double up

			- Orestes

2005-11-30T02:58:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 30 November 2005
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I think replace the external links with the internal links (which should link to the websites). This also justifies the need for the Categories: Helper Applications page. -- [[Wyatt]]		I think replace the external links with the internal links (which should link to the websites). This also justifies the need for the Categories: Helper Applications page. -- [[Wyatt]]

			----

			We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page.

2005-11-29T00:43:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 29 November 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	There is a perfectly nice [[Foxtrick]] page, as well as pages for most of the other apps. I think they should be included in the page, my question to you is: How? Remove the external links in favour of internal ones? --[[User:GM-Lau\|GM-Lau]] 00:30, 29 November 2005 (UTC)		There is a perfectly nice [[Foxtrick]] page, as well as pages for most of the other apps. I think they should be included in the page, my question to you is: How? Remove the external links in favour of internal ones? --[[User:GM-Lau\|GM-Lau]] 00:30, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


			I think replace the external links with the internal links (which should link to the websites). This also justifies the need for the Categories: Helper Applications page. -- [[Wyatt]]

2005-11-29T00:30:06Z

Wiki Pages.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 29 November 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	'''''NB:''' Please refrain from posting free .tk adresses, and similar websites as they contain popup advertising, that may also contain malware''		'''''NB:''' Please refrain from posting free .tk adresses, and similar websites as they contain popup advertising, that may also contain malware''

			== Wiki Pages. ==

			There is a perfectly nice [[Foxtrick]] page, as well as pages for most of the other apps. I think they should be included in the page, my question to you is: How? Remove the external links in favour of internal ones? --[[User:GM-Lau\|GM-Lau]] 00:30, 29 November 2005 (UTC)