Talk:Myths - Revision history

Mr Wednesday at 19:53, 17 November 2006

2006-11-17T19:53:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 17 November 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Regardless, not us not forget to use the <nowiki>{{Based_on_opinion}}</nowiki> template, since it is of the opinion of those editors. Some of the claims made in that thread are bogus, such as Bob being a myth. He's a legend, not a myth. Also, the original incarnation had poor leadership, not solid, so he wasn't the team leader. [[User:Kc-jake\|-- Jake]] 19:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		Regardless, not us not forget to use the <nowiki>{{Based_on_opinion}}</nowiki> template, since it is of the opinion of those editors. Some of the claims made in that thread are bogus, such as Bob being a myth. He's a legend, not a myth. Also, the original incarnation had poor leadership, not solid, so he wasn't the team leader. [[User:Kc-jake\|-- Jake]] 19:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

			:Whether we need <nowiki>{{Based on opinion}}</nowiki> depends on the exact material covered. The matter of derbies, for instance, is not based on opinion at all—the current effect is covered in the rules and the rumored former effect is debunked by HTs. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 19:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Kc-jake at 19:01, 17 November 2006

2006-11-17T19:01:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 17 November 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I guess it depends on whether the "myths" are big enough to merit a full article. If not, then this article could act as a catch-all. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 19:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)		:I guess it depends on whether the "myths" are big enough to merit a full article. If not, then this article could act as a catch-all. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 19:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

			Regardless, not us not forget to use the <nowiki>{{Based_on_opinion}}</nowiki> template, since it is of the opinion of those editors. Some of the claims made in that thread are bogus, such as Bob being a myth. He's a legend, not a myth. Also, the original incarnation had poor leadership, not solid, so he wasn't the team leader. [[User:Kc-jake\|-- Jake]] 19:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Mr Wednesday at 19:54, 16 November 2006

2006-11-16T19:54:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 16 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page has been created with regard to the discussion currently ongoing in the Global (English) conference. Thread ID: 7338633.1. Many of the suggestions already have an entry within the hattrick wiki so I would suggest that a new category called Myths be created & these entries added to that. Any new 'myths' could be entered as a new article & placed in the myths category. Your thoughts? --[[User:FFHF-Escafeld\|FFHF-Escafeld]] 13:37, November 16, 2006 (UTC)		This page has been created with regard to the discussion currently ongoing in the Global (English) conference. Thread ID: 7338633.1. Many of the suggestions already have an entry within the hattrick wiki so I would suggest that a new category called Myths be created & these entries added to that. Any new 'myths' could be entered as a new article & placed in the myths category. Your thoughts? --[[User:FFHF-Escafeld\|FFHF-Escafeld]] 13:37, November 16, 2006 (UTC)

			:I guess it depends on whether the "myths" are big enough to merit a full article. If not, then this article could act as a catch-all. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 19:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Escafeld at 13:37, 16 November 2006

2006-11-16T13:37:53Z

New page

This page has been created with regard to the discussion currently ongoing in the Global (English) conference. Thread ID: 7338633.1. Many of the suggestions already have an entry within the hattrick wiki so I would suggest that a new category called Myths be created & these entries added to that. Any new 'myths' could be entered as a new article & placed in the myths category. Your thoughts? --[[User:FFHF-Escafeld|FFHF-Escafeld]] 13:37, November 16, 2006 (UTC)