Talk:Skills - Revision history

76.195.77.46: Stamina Drops

2007-06-30T12:17:52Z

Stamina Drops

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 30 June 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake. Reverted.		It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake. Reverted.
	--[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

			== Stamina Drops ==

			It seems, to me, that there is an increase in the speed in which stamina drops that is out of proportion to the rate of which training skills increase. If this is by design, I would like to comment on how frustrating this is when your trying to build a team slowly over time.

Jhattara: Reverted edit of 86.101.88.53, changed back to last version by Mr Wednesday

2007-05-31T07:02:28Z

Reverted edit of 86.101.88.53, changed back to last version by Mr Wednesday

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:02, 31 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<math>Insert formula here</math><math>Insert formula here</math><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>--[[User:86.101.88.53\|86.101.88.53]] 18:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
	~~----~~

	~~----b,c,éxélltopsppc,osrspktlgácéx,ékddokgéxy,rjktopsdgmyéÉdokyá,ékgédfok~~

	~~----~~
	how about putting in information rather than just cold facts and lists		how about putting in information rather than just cold facts and lists
	like inform that anything below weak is worthless.		like inform that anything below weak is worthless.

86.101.88.53 at 18:01, 29 May 2007

2007-05-29T18:01:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 29 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<math>Insert formula here</math><math>Insert formula here</math><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>--[[User:86.101.88.53\|86.101.88.53]] 18:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
			----

			----b,c,éxélltopsppc,osrspktlgácéx,ékddokgéxy,rjktopsdgmyéÉdokyá,ékgédfok

			----
	how about putting in information rather than just cold facts and lists		how about putting in information rather than just cold facts and lists
	like inform that anything below weak is worthless.		like inform that anything below weak is worthless.

Mr Wednesday: rv

2006-04-26T21:27:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 26 April 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Maybe a discussion on what counts as a very high skill in something.		Maybe a discussion on what counts as a very high skill in something.
	What level of skill is state of the art. when do wages become a real problem. etc		What level of skill is state of the art. when do wages become a real problem. etc
	.
			discussion about form, what is average form level, can you expect your players to be inadequate, passable or solid on average?


			Serafimul:
			That would be nice. But if we are to extend those subjects maybe would be easier to split it in different pages.
			---
			I don't think that making the font-size smaller will help anyone.

	I agree that the wikipedia shouldn't just be a copy of the rules. I won't start working on this page at the moment, but I'd be glad if someone did. I'm working on the related topic subskills and would be glad if someone added a statement about the difference between the skill that is shown on the Hattrick page and the underlying skill of a player.		I agree that the wikipedia shouldn't just be a copy of the rules. I won't start working on this page at the moment, but I'd be glad if someone did. I'm working on the related topic subskills and would be glad if someone added a statement about the difference between the skill that is shown on the Hattrick page and the underlying skill of a player.
Line 23:		Line 30:
	It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake. Reverted.		It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake. Reverted.
	--[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

	~~== fgn ==~~

	~~gjgfjdsufghuydsfgyfdufdsydsufigv fuk~~

200.48.226.22: fgn

2006-04-26T21:16:14Z

fgn

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 26 April 2006
Line 23:		Line 23:
	It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake. Reverted.		It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake. Reverted.
	--[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

			== fgn ==

			gjgfjdsufghuydsfgyfdufdsydsufigv fuk

200.48.226.22: gtrew

2006-04-26T21:15:39Z

gtrew

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 26 April 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Maybe a discussion on what counts as a very high skill in something.		Maybe a discussion on what counts as a very high skill in something.
	What level of skill is state of the art. when do wages become a real problem. etc		What level of skill is state of the art. when do wages become a real problem. etc
			.
	~~discussion about form, what is average form level, can you expect your players to be inadequate, passable or solid on average?~~


	~~Serafimul:~~
	~~That would be nice. But if we are to extend those subjects maybe would be easier to split it in different pages.~~
	~~---~~
	~~I don't think that making the font-size smaller will help anyone~~.

	I agree that the wikipedia shouldn't just be a copy of the rules. I won't start working on this page at the moment, but I'd be glad if someone did. I'm working on the related topic subskills and would be glad if someone added a statement about the difference between the skill that is shown on the Hattrick page and the underlying skill of a player.		I agree that the wikipedia shouldn't just be a copy of the rules. I won't start working on this page at the moment, but I'd be glad if someone did. I'm working on the related topic subskills and would be glad if someone added a statement about the difference between the skill that is shown on the Hattrick page and the underlying skill of a player.

Mr Wednesday at 17:15, 19 January 2006

2006-01-19T17:15:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 19 January 2006
Line 28:		Line 28:

	----		----
	It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake? ~~Can someone revert?~~		It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake. Reverted.
	--[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Mr Wednesday at 17:12, 19 January 2006

2006-01-19T17:12:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 19 January 2006
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Please try to keep the descriptions of skills on this page very short. USe the individual skill page for detailed descriptions. See [[Stamina]] for an example		Please try to keep the descriptions of skills on this page very short. USe the individual skill page for detailed descriptions. See [[Stamina]] for an example

			----
			It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake? Can someone revert?
			--[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Dancing rob: page usage note

2005-11-30T11:37:12Z

page usage note

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 30 November 2005
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Yes, I agree. However, by changing my sample you removed the c-skill aspect.....--[[User:Psymon\|psymon]] 10:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)		Yes, I agree. However, by changing my sample you removed the c-skill aspect.....--[[User:Psymon\|psymon]] 10:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

			----

			Please try to keep the descriptions of skills on this page very short. USe the individual skill page for detailed descriptions. See [[Stamina]] for an example

Psymon: question regarding the sample, attn dancing rob

2005-11-30T10:57:14Z

question regarding the sample, attn dancing rob

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 30 November 2005
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Generally happy with the content now, but the first paragraph needs work [[User:Dancing rob\|Dancing rob]] 23:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)		Generally happy with the content now, but the first paragraph needs work [[User:Dancing rob\|Dancing rob]] 23:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

			----

			Yes, I agree. However, by changing my sample you removed the c-skill aspect.....--[[User:Psymon\|psymon]] 10:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)