Talk:Tactics - Revision history

Mr Wednesday at 05:35, 31 January 2006

2006-01-31T05:35:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 31 January 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:

	I don't like this article at all, it only talks about the 'special tactics', there's much more to tactics than just this imo...		I don't like this article at all, it only talks about the 'special tactics', there's much more to tactics than just this imo...

			----
			Could we get some division and attribution so that people's thoughts can be kept separate? TIA. --[[User:Mr Wednesday\|Mr Wednesday]] 05:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

84.73.153.54 at 14:39, 28 November 2005

2005-11-28T14:39:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 28 November 2005
Line 15:		Line 15:

	would agree with that. I think there is a little too much description here at the moment, but 2 - 3 lines on each tactic would be good.		would agree with that. I think there is a little too much description here at the moment, but 2 - 3 lines on each tactic would be good.


			I don't like this article at all, it only talks about the 'special tactics', there's much more to tactics than just this imo...

Dancing rob at 17:48, 25 November 2005

2005-11-25T17:48:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 25 November 2005
Line 13:		Line 13:
	explaining formations, player orders, tactics for training types, and match tactic orders		explaining formations, player orders, tactics for training types, and match tactic orders
	and then link to far more detailed info on all the above on other pages like the 3-4-3 page or the FTW page etc		and then link to far more detailed info on all the above on other pages like the 3-4-3 page or the FTW page etc

			would agree with that. I think there is a little too much description here at the moment, but 2 - 3 lines on each tactic would be good.

Theschneer at 17:44, 25 November 2005

2005-11-25T17:44:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 25 November 2005
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Each tactic should have it's own page. They're an important aspect of the game		Each tactic should have it's own page. They're an important aspect of the game

			This tactics page could be a nice general tactic page
			explaining formations, player orders, tactics for training types, and match tactic orders
			and then link to far more detailed info on all the above on other pages like the 3-4-3 page or the FTW page etc

Dancing rob at 17:27, 25 November 2005

2005-11-25T17:27:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 25 November 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:

	I took out the idea of AOW and AIM being dependent upon your series ladder level. 1, it's confusing. 2, it's not proven. Opinion is not a good idea in a Wiki, unless stated as such.		I took out the idea of AOW and AIM being dependent upon your series ladder level. 1, it's confusing. 2, it's not proven. Opinion is not a good idea in a Wiki, unless stated as such.

			Each tactic should have it's own page. They're an important aspect of the game

OgtheDim at 05:27, 25 November 2005

2005-11-25T05:27:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:27, 25 November 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Shout people!		Shout people!


			I took out the idea of AOW and AIM being dependent upon your series ladder level. 1, it's confusing. 2, it's not proven. Opinion is not a good idea in a Wiki, unless stated as such.

Boucoudabou at 00:39, 25 November 2005

2005-11-25T00:39:44Z

New page

What are we going to do with this in terms of page outlay - should each tactic get its own separate page or should they all stay below like they are now? We can't have both I suppose, but we ''do'' have both now.

I also dislike the links from abbreviations, which should be fixed as soon as we have made the decision above.

Shout people!