User talk:Mikkel - Revision history

Mikkel at 17:25, 5 December 2005

2005-12-05T17:25:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 5 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Nope, I did read it, and to tell you the truth, it really is sad that you put alot of work and someone comes and deletes it. Not even posts a message for us to read and maybe you had a point, but after deleting it, that doesn't matter

	''Message deleted. User was unable to read page before adding to it.''		''Message deleted. User was unable to read page before adding to it.''

2005-12-05T17:24:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 5 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Nope, I did read it, and to tell you the truth, it really is sad that you put alot of work and someone comes and deletes it. Not even posts a message for us to read and maybe you had a point, but after deleting it, ~~thats not~~ matter		Nope, I did read it, and to tell you the truth, it really is sad that you put alot of work and someone comes and deletes it. Not even posts a message for us to read and maybe you had a point, but after deleting it, that doesn't matter

	''Message deleted. User was unable to read page before adding to it.''		''Message deleted. User was unable to read page before adding to it.''

2005-12-05T17:24:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 5 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Nope, I did read it, and to tell you the truth, it really is sad that you put alot of work and someone comes and deletes it. Not even posts a message for us to read and maybe you had a point, but after deleting it, thats not matter
	''Message deleted. User was unable to read page before adding to it.''		''Message deleted. User was unable to read page before adding to it.''

2005-12-05T17:17:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 5 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Hi Mikkel,~~		''Message deleted. User was unable to read page before adding to it.''
	~~Please explain why you~~ deleted ~~some pages in Israel~~.
	~~We worked hard on it, and if there is anything that bugs you - you can post~~ it ~~on the discussion page.~~
	~~Thanks~~.

	~~--[[user:Superow\|Superow]]~~

	----		----

2005-12-05T17:13:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 5 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Hi Mikkel,
			Please explain why you deleted some pages in Israel.
			We worked hard on it, and if there is anything that bugs you - you can post it on the discussion page.
			Thanks.

			--[[user:Superow\|Superow]]

			----


	Hello Mikkel,		Hello Mikkel,

Line 5:		Line 15:
	You have no authority to decide by yourself which articles are relevent and which aren't.		You have no authority to decide by yourself which articles are relevent and which aren't.

	If you wish to raise the subject you can propose a policy, for now all you are doing is destroying other people's work. --[[User:Giggsip\|~~Giggsip]]~~ 17:22, 4 December 2005 (UTC)		If you wish to raise the subject you can propose a policy, for now all you are doing is destroying other people's work. --[[Giggsip]]User:Giggsip\| 17:22, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

	//		//

2005-12-05T16:31:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 5 December 2005
Line 133:		Line 133:

	--[[User:Carlesmu\|carlesmu]] 12:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC)		--[[User:Carlesmu\|carlesmu]] 12:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

			I'm sorry, Carlesmu, but that's just not how things work. There is nothing to discuss. Ignorance does not magically make those articles relevant, so there really is nothing to discuss. I can see you've all tried, but all your points have been moot or invalid.

			Disrespect is not reading what the purpose of the place is before using it, so if anything, ignorance or not, they're the ones being disrespectful. It's getting really old having to reply to this, because no matter how much all of you people complain, it doesn't change the facts that the articles didn't belong here in any way, and that no work was lost for anyone.

			I can't believe that all of you people would go through the effort of spamming my user page -this- much, just looking to justify articles that don't even belong here. If you don't like it, you can go add to Wikipedia instead. I'm sure they'll love it.

			[[User:Mikkel\|mikkel]] 16:31, December 5, 2005 (UTC)

2005-12-05T12:14:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 5 December 2005
Line 129:		Line 129:

	[[User:Mikkel\|mikkel]] 21:18, December 4, 2005 (UTC)		[[User:Mikkel\|mikkel]] 21:18, December 4, 2005 (UTC)

			A member of the ht-wiki community made an effort to write them and, at my understanding, he thought they were valuable for the comunity. Please, avoid to be disrespectul with the others ht-wiki members if he wrote them then there is something to discuss.

			--[[User:Carlesmu\|carlesmu]] 12:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

2005-12-04T21:18:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 4 December 2005
Line 127:		Line 127:

	I agree that articles need to be discussed before deletion, but only if there's something to discuss. There was absolutely nothing to discuss in these cases, as they were purely religious, historical or political, thus having no reason to exist, no matter how much you debate.		I agree that articles need to be discussed before deletion, but only if there's something to discuss. There was absolutely nothing to discuss in these cases, as they were purely religious, historical or political, thus having no reason to exist, no matter how much you debate.

			[[User:Mikkel\|mikkel]] 21:18, December 4, 2005 (UTC)

2005-12-04T21:18:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 4 December 2005
Line 125:		Line 125:

	I strongly dissagry. It should be discused before deletion. --[[User:Carlesmu\|carlesmu]] 21:08, 4 December 2005 (UTC)		I strongly dissagry. It should be discused before deletion. --[[User:Carlesmu\|carlesmu]] 21:08, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

			I agree that articles need to be discussed before deletion, but only if there's something to discuss. There was absolutely nothing to discuss in these cases, as they were purely religious, historical or political, thus having no reason to exist, no matter how much you debate.

2005-12-04T21:08:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 4 December 2005
Line 123:		Line 123:

	[[User:Mikkel\|mikkel]] 20:57, December 4, 2005 (UTC)		[[User:Mikkel\|mikkel]] 20:57, December 4, 2005 (UTC)

			I strongly dissagry. It should be discused before deletion. --[[User:Carlesmu\|carlesmu]] 21:08, 4 December 2005 (UTC)