Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Clubs"

From Hattrick
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
*divide by country - is it worth it?  
 
*divide by country - is it worth it?  
 
Regarding the second issue, at this moment there is an [[:Category:Clubs_by_country]] as well as subcategories under [[:Category:Clubs]]. To get rid of all this, my suggestion is to leave [[:Category:Clubs]] as a dummy category, and split its contents in [[:Category:User Clubs]] and [[:Category:Remarkable Clubs]], adding subcategories for countries under each one. --[[User:Duno7|duno7]] 13:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 
Regarding the second issue, at this moment there is an [[:Category:Clubs_by_country]] as well as subcategories under [[:Category:Clubs]]. To get rid of all this, my suggestion is to leave [[:Category:Clubs]] as a dummy category, and split its contents in [[:Category:User Clubs]] and [[:Category:Remarkable Clubs]], adding subcategories for countries under each one. --[[User:Duno7|duno7]] 13:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
Agree with Duno here [[User:Dancing rob|Dancing rob]] 13:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:55, 29 November 2005

What should we do about this one? The list is full of non-memorable clubs, which is a hard to avoid problem. There is already a category for non-remarkable teams: Category:User Clubs, and its talk page Category_talk:User_Clubs. I think the issues are:

  • remarkable vs non-remarkable teams - how to categorize them?
  • divide by country - is it worth it?

Regarding the second issue, at this moment there is an Category:Clubs_by_country as well as subcategories under Category:Clubs. To get rid of all this, my suggestion is to leave Category:Clubs as a dummy category, and split its contents in Category:User Clubs and Category:Remarkable Clubs, adding subcategories for countries under each one. --duno7 13:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Agree with Duno here Dancing rob 13:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC)