Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Game Concepts"

From Hattrick
(Agree)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
We can all agree that users, teams, countries and regions are not game concepts but I think we should be more strict: [[CHPP]] os not really a game concept and neither are [[Credits]] and [[Hattrick Mobile]] if you ask me. Opinions appreciated:-) --[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 23:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 
We can all agree that users, teams, countries and regions are not game concepts but I think we should be more strict: [[CHPP]] os not really a game concept and neither are [[Credits]] and [[Hattrick Mobile]] if you ask me. Opinions appreciated:-) --[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 23:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 
----
 
 
I agree with you. I think that it should only include those subjects that are really vital to the game.
 
  
 
----
 
----
Line 23: Line 19:
 
With that in mind, I don't think things such as [[CHPP]], [[Hattrick Mobile]], [[Credits]] and [[Shop]] belong in this category. BTW, Casartelli, please attach your signature to your edits. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 23:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 
With that in mind, I don't think things such as [[CHPP]], [[Hattrick Mobile]], [[Credits]] and [[Shop]] belong in this category. BTW, Casartelli, please attach your signature to your edits. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 23:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
  
== Agree ==
+
Glad I mentioned it here before I started editting away;-) (though I'm not 100% convinced)--[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 23:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
  
I agree with you. I think that it should only include those subjects that are really vital to the game.
+
-----
 +
Sorry,.. i'm really messing up..<br>
 +
 
 +
But my opinion is that only vital subjects should make it to this category.<br><
 +
Ps. How can I make an autograph? [[User:Casartelli|Casartelli]]
 +
 
 +
&tilde;&tilde;&tilde;&tilde; (four tildes) (this also gives you the time) --[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 23:32, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
I'd also agree there are far too many categories [[User:Dancing rob|Dancing rob]] 23:32, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
----
 +
Thanks [[User:Casartelli|Casartelli]] 23:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
----
 +
I'm removing them (I'm who added them). I was adding all whan has a special meaning in the HT world. --[[User:Carlesmu|carlesmu]] 23:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
: Hehe, that could have ended you up giving every item here this category;-) --[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 23:35, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:: Yes, almost all,  some kind of category with everything with a specific meaning in HT should be usefull, I thought this category was for this ;-) --[[User:Carlesmu|carlesmu]] 23:46, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
Still think we need to decide on exactly what a concept is....
 +
 
 +
I would shrink it a little, and include things like economy, tactics, fomations but remove things like FTW & daytrading. [[User:Dancing rob|Dancing rob]] 12:12, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
----
 +
I think basically everything that CAN be put in a sub-category should be put there. So daytrading to transfers; clown and teamleader to teamspirit (that should defenitely be listed here); AoW and AiM to tactics; etc. Only concepts that really can't be categorized in a subcategory should be listed here. --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 14:39, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:39, 2 December 2005

I see that the Category:Game Concepts is added to a lot of pages lately. However, I do think that a lot of concepts do not really fit.


We can all agree that users, teams, countries and regions are not game concepts but I think we should be more strict: CHPP os not really a game concept and neither are Credits and Hattrick Mobile if you ask me. Opinions appreciated:-) --GM-Lau 23:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


Entry in Merriam-Webster:

Main Entry: con·cept Pronunciation: 'kän-"sept Function: noun Etymology: Latin conceptum, neuter of conceptus, past participle of concipere to conceive -- more at CONCEIVE 1 : something conceived in the mind : THOUGHT, NOTION 2 : an abstract or generic idea generalized from particular instances synonym see IDEA

With that in mind, I don't think things such as CHPP, Hattrick Mobile, Credits and Shop belong in this category. BTW, Casartelli, please attach your signature to your edits. --Catalyst2950 23:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Glad I mentioned it here before I started editting away;-) (though I'm not 100% convinced)--GM-Lau 23:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


Sorry,.. i'm really messing up..

But my opinion is that only vital subjects should make it to this category.
< Ps. How can I make an autograph? Casartelli

˜˜˜˜ (four tildes) (this also gives you the time) --GM-Lau 23:32, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

I'd also agree there are far too many categories Dancing rob 23:32, 27 November 2005 (UTC)



Thanks Casartelli 23:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


I'm removing them (I'm who added them). I was adding all whan has a special meaning in the HT world. --carlesmu 23:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


Hehe, that could have ended you up giving every item here this category;-) --GM-Lau 23:35, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Yes, almost all, some kind of category with everything with a specific meaning in HT should be usefull, I thought this category was for this ;-) --carlesmu 23:46, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Still think we need to decide on exactly what a concept is....

I would shrink it a little, and include things like economy, tactics, fomations but remove things like FTW & daytrading. Dancing rob 12:12, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


I think basically everything that CAN be put in a sub-category should be put there. So daytrading to transfers; clown and teamleader to teamspirit (that should defenitely be listed here); AoW and AiM to tactics; etc. Only concepts that really can't be categorized in a subcategory should be listed here. --ukelele 14:39, 2 December 2005 (UTC)