Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Game Concepts"

From Hattrick
Line 21: Line 21:
 
Glad I mentioned it here before I started editting away;-) (though I'm not 100% convinced)--[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 23:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 
Glad I mentioned it here before I started editting away;-) (though I'm not 100% convinced)--[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 23:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
  
 +
-----
 
Sorry,.. i'm really messing up..<br>
 
Sorry,.. i'm really messing up..<br>
  
 
But my opinion is that only vital subjects should make it to this category.<br><
 
But my opinion is that only vital subjects should make it to this category.<br><
 
Ps. How can I make an autograph?
 
Ps. How can I make an autograph?

Revision as of 01:30, 28 November 2005

I see that the Category:Game Concepts is added to a lot of pages lately. However, I do think that a lot of concepts do not really fit.


We can all agree that users, teams, countries and regions are not game concepts but I think we should be more strict: CHPP os not really a game concept and neither are Credits and Hattrick Mobile if you ask me. Opinions appreciated:-) --GM-Lau 23:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


Entry in Merriam-Webster:

Main Entry: con·cept Pronunciation: 'kän-"sept Function: noun Etymology: Latin conceptum, neuter of conceptus, past participle of concipere to conceive -- more at CONCEIVE 1 : something conceived in the mind : THOUGHT, NOTION 2 : an abstract or generic idea generalized from particular instances synonym see IDEA

With that in mind, I don't think things such as CHPP, Hattrick Mobile, Credits and Shop belong in this category. BTW, Casartelli, please attach your signature to your edits. --Catalyst2950 23:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Glad I mentioned it here before I started editting away;-) (though I'm not 100% convinced)--GM-Lau 23:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


Sorry,.. i'm really messing up..

But my opinion is that only vital subjects should make it to this category.
< Ps. How can I make an autograph?