Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Game Concepts"

From Hattrick
(Agree)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
With that in mind, I don't think things such as [[CHPP]], [[Hattrick Mobile]], [[Credits]] and [[Shop]] belong in this category. BTW, Casartelli, please attach your signature to your edits. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 23:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 
With that in mind, I don't think things such as [[CHPP]], [[Hattrick Mobile]], [[Credits]] and [[Shop]] belong in this category. BTW, Casartelli, please attach your signature to your edits. --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 23:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Agree ==
 +
 +
I agree with you. I think that it should only include those subjects that are really vital to the game.

Revision as of 00:25, 28 November 2005

I see that the Category:Game Concepts is added to a lot of pages lately. However, I do think that a lot of concepts do not really fit.


We can all agree that users, teams, countries and regions are not game concepts but I think we should be more strict: CHPP os not really a game concept and neither are Credits and Hattrick Mobile if you ask me. Opinions appreciated:-) --GM-Lau 23:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


I agree with you. I think that it should only include those subjects that are really vital to the game.


Entry in Merriam-Webster:

Main Entry: con·cept Pronunciation: 'kän-"sept Function: noun Etymology: Latin conceptum, neuter of conceptus, past participle of concipere to conceive -- more at CONCEIVE 1 : something conceived in the mind : THOUGHT, NOTION 2 : an abstract or generic idea generalized from particular instances synonym see IDEA

With that in mind, I don't think things such as CHPP, Hattrick Mobile, Credits and Shop belong in this category. BTW, Casartelli, please attach your signature to your edits. --Catalyst2950 23:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Agree

I agree with you. I think that it should only include those subjects that are really vital to the game.