Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Luxembourg Series"

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
but why rename Luxembourgish Series to Luxembourg Series? This makes no sense, regarding the other examples and I'm pretty sure it has to be "Luxembourgish" as adjective. ;) --[[User:82.126.141.238|82.126.141.238]] 18:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 
but why rename Luxembourgish Series to Luxembourg Series? This makes no sense, regarding the other examples and I'm pretty sure it has to be "Luxembourgish" as adjective. ;) --[[User:82.126.141.238|82.126.141.238]] 18:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  
: Check the CIA factbook. It's been used as the source for all the adjectives and in there the adjective for Luxembourg is Luxembourg. --[[User:Jhattara|Jhattara]] 06:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
+
: Check the [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/lu.html CIA factbook]. It's been used as the source for all the adjectives and in there the adjective for Luxembourg is Luxembourg. --[[User:Jhattara|Jhattara]] 06:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:37, 15 May 2007

Discrepancy

Urm...

Albanian Series
Argentinian Series
Belgian Series
Brazilian Series
Bulgarian series
Canadian Series
Danish Series
Dominican Series
Dutch Series
etc.

but why rename Luxembourgish Series to Luxembourg Series? This makes no sense, regarding the other examples and I'm pretty sure it has to be "Luxembourgish" as adjective. ;) --82.126.141.238 18:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Check the CIA factbook. It's been used as the source for all the adjectives and in there the adjective for Luxembourg is Luxembourg. --Jhattara 06:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)