Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Luxembourg Series"

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
: Check the [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/lu.html CIA factbook]. It's been used as the source for all the adjectives and in there the adjective for Luxembourg is Luxembourg. --[[User:Jhattara|Jhattara]] 06:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 
: Check the [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/lu.html CIA factbook]. It's been used as the source for all the adjectives and in there the adjective for Luxembourg is Luxembourg. --[[User:Jhattara|Jhattara]] 06:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
:: Hmm... ok, guess we have to stick to that bible (+ some other sites seem also to use this version)... but still weird, because in 99% "Luxembourgish" is used as an adjective and even by most of the Luxembourgers :-p --[[User:82.126.222.199|82.126.222.199]] 18:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:37, 15 May 2007

Discrepancy

Urm...

Albanian Series
Argentinian Series
Belgian Series
Brazilian Series
Bulgarian series
Canadian Series
Danish Series
Dominican Series
Dutch Series
etc.

but why rename Luxembourgish Series to Luxembourg Series? This makes no sense, regarding the other examples and I'm pretty sure it has to be "Luxembourgish" as adjective. ;) --82.126.141.238 18:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Check the CIA factbook. It's been used as the source for all the adjectives and in there the adjective for Luxembourg is Luxembourg. --Jhattara 06:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Hmm... ok, guess we have to stick to that bible (+ some other sites seem also to use this version)... but still weird, because in 99% "Luxembourgish" is used as an adjective and even by most of the Luxembourgers :-p --82.126.222.199 18:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)