Difference between revisions of "Talk:Attack in the middle"

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Talk:Attack in the Middle moved to Talk:Attack in the middle)
(Discussion about last line in article)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
----
 
----
 
Lol didn't really make sense indeed. I'll thumbnail it next time. --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 18:59, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 
Lol didn't really make sense indeed. I'll thumbnail it next time. --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 18:59, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
----
 +
About the last line of the article: I wouldn't really consider the possibility for your opponent to stack his central defense a drawback of ''AIM''. That's more a drawback of being predictable in general. So maybe we should delete that line? --[[User:Larsw84|larsw84]] 14:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:37, 15 December 2005

Creating pages with acronymes might not be the best ideea. So let's move pages like AIM to Attack in the Middle and redirect the acronym page to the full name page. This way we can be coherent.

Good idea. I'll do the same with the AOW page.

Haha

Nice random picture... but it should probably be thumnailed next time. To Thumbnail a picture, just add |thumb after the image file name in the image tag. --Catalyst 18:49:10, 2005-11-27 (UTC)


Lol didn't really make sense indeed. I'll thumbnail it next time. --ukelele 18:59, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


About the last line of the article: I wouldn't really consider the possibility for your opponent to stack his central defense a drawback of AIM. That's more a drawback of being predictable in general. So maybe we should delete that line? --larsw84 14:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC)