Difference between revisions of "Talk:Helper application"

From Hattrick
m (wrong article :))
 
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
Why?
 
Why?
 
==Lock Request==
 
Since this page is the target of bot vandalism, why don't we lock it? It's just a redirect page anyways and not prone to changes. If not can someone please ban the account that has done the 7 last vandalisms or something like that? --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 07:47, August 16, 2009 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 09:48, 16 August 2009

Feel free to add whatever helper applications you feel like, just make a note as to wether there freeware, shareware, or a trial based product, and that you add it to the right category


NB: Please refrain from posting free .tk adresses, and similar websites as they contain popup advertising, that may also contain malware

Wiki Pages.[edit]

There is a perfectly nice Foxtrick page, as well as pages for most of the other apps. I think they should be included in the page, my question to you is: How? Remove the external links in favour of internal ones? --GM-Lau 00:30, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


I think replace the external links with the internal links (which should link to the websites). This also justifies the need for the Categories: Helper Applications page. -- Wyatt


We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page, as that seems like a double up

that said, why do we need to double up on descriptions that are allready provided on the external links.

- Orestes


How about we remove the "Freeware" spam and add some text saying "all applications are freeware, unless stated otherwise"? --Catalyst2950 13:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Why?