Talk:Infamous Hattrickers

From Hattrick
Revision as of 23:50, 15 December 2005 by Larsw84 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

ehm, the language of the wiki is English, not Dutch. Maybe a good idea to translate this stuff, if you really think these pages have value;-) --GM-Lau 20:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

You lazy bum :) You could've done that yourself ;) Now I did the job, but I'm not going to translate all pages about the infamous users themselves. --larsw84

I don't think 99.99% of people ever heard of these guys... Does the page really have a purpose? --Catalyst2950 20:16, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Suggestion: maybe delete this page and create a category instead? --larsw84 20:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Umm....who took out R-B?

Dennis86 did, judging from the history of the article. <--- I did what? 14:03, 15 December 2005 (UTC) Dennis86

Ogthedim: it might be a good idea to put your signature after your comments here. --larsw84 00:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Dennis86: you removed a link to Rondell-Beene, another infamous Hattricker added by Ogthedim. Since you apparently didn't know you did it, you probably did it by accident, so I'll place him back. --larsw84 14:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't think, that it's good idea to have such page at all. Or I do not understand the purpose of it. As initially stated "and were either banned, locked, heavily fined, or known in other ways for remarkable behaviour". Excuse me, but since when, cheating, misbehaving in forrums, etc (all things, fow which you might get banned is a remarkable). And it's meant to have this banned list of "honour", then Rondell-Beene certainly does NOT belong here. At last, thousands users are remarkable in their own way. For me none of these guys are role models in Hattrick. If everyone will add their rescpected users here, then it will grow to be the same like Users page. I agree with Catalyst2950 vote for removal of this page. --LA-Motto 18:36:08, 2005-12-15 (UTC)

Any thoughts on my suggestion to have a category for this instead of a page? --larsw84 22:50, 15 December 2005 (UTC)