Difference between revisions of "Talk:N00b"

From Hattrick
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
--[[User:Septimusjm|septimusjm]] 20:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Septimusjm|septimusjm]] 20:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
----
 +
The problem as I see it is that n00b is a global term, but this article only reflects the USA conference joke of it.
 +
 +
Maybe it can be part of the user's page, but I don't see it as being a seperate  value by itself. --[[User:Giggsip|Giggsip]] 20:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:18, 6 December 2005

Is this article really neccessary?


I think not, especially not the first part. --Giggsip 20:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


Are any of them necessary? I didn't create the article, but I do find it amusing--as would most of us who often read the USA conference on HT. Besides, it's a wiki and it's not a question of necessity but of topicality and organization. This is plenty topical and doesn't affect this wiki's organization at all.

--septimusjm 20:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


The problem as I see it is that n00b is a global term, but this article only reflects the USA conference joke of it.

Maybe it can be part of the user's page, but I don't see it as being a seperate value by itself. --Giggsip 20:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)