Difference between revisions of "Talk:N00b"

From Hattrick
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
Maybe it can be part of the user's page, but I don't see it as being a seperate  value by itself. --[[User:Giggsip|Giggsip]] 20:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 
Maybe it can be part of the user's page, but I don't see it as being a seperate  value by itself. --[[User:Giggsip|Giggsip]] 20:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
agree. then he should make clear that he means US teams. There are enough IV. division series in the world that are stronger as an avarage US III. division. --[[User:Shyrlden|Shyrlden]] 20:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:19, 6 December 2005

Is this article really neccessary?


I think not, especially not the first part. --Giggsip 20:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


Are any of them necessary? I didn't create the article, but I do find it amusing--as would most of us who often read the USA conference on HT. Besides, it's a wiki and it's not a question of necessity but of topicality and organization. This is plenty topical and doesn't affect this wiki's organization at all.

--septimusjm 20:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


The problem as I see it is that n00b is a global term, but this article only reflects the USA conference joke of it.

Maybe it can be part of the user's page, but I don't see it as being a seperate value by itself. --Giggsip 20:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


agree. then he should make clear that he means US teams. There are enough IV. division series in the world that are stronger as an avarage US III. division. --Shyrlden 20:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)