Is this article really neccessary?
I think not, especially not the first part. --Giggsip 20:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Are any of them necessary? I didn't create the article, but I do find it amusing--as would most of us who often read the USA conference on HT. Besides, it's a wiki and it's not a question of necessity but of topicality and organization. This is plenty topical and doesn't affect this wiki's organization at all.
--septimusjm 20:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
The problem as I see it is that n00b is a global term, but this article only reflects the USA conference joke of it.
Maybe it can be part of the user's page, but I don't see it as being a seperate value by itself. --Giggsip 20:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
agree. then he should make clear that he means US teams. There are enough IV. division series in the world that are stronger as an avarage US III. division. --Shyrlden 20:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Newb is the global term, is it not? Anyway, the context has now been clarified. Besides, if you want to provide various definitions of n00b than edit it and add the appropriate headings.
Also, you should remember that it's not like anyone's categorized it as an important "game concept" or anything. It's pretty much sits alone, linked from only 2 or 3 contextual pages. --septimusjm
He said "n00b is a global term", not "n00b" is a global HT term. It is used one a lot of sites worldwide. (like 3l11t and other "cool" variant of words) I have no proplem with a extra page for that, but the context should be clear of every HT user.--Shyrlden 20:42, 6 December 2005 (UTC)