Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rating"

From Hattrick
m
Line 1: Line 1:
Took out one opinion of what is needed attack wise to beat a certain level of defence.  This discussion is best left in an opinion piece, and not in the main article.  Added lots of potential links.
+
Took out one opinion of what is needed attack wise to beat a certain level of defence.  This discussion is best left in an opinion piece, and not in the main article.  Added lots of potential link
 
 
---
 
 
 
Pages now exist for
 
 
 
attack ratings
 
defence ratings
 
 
 
L / R / C defence
 
L / R / C attack
 
 
 
any more needed?[[User:Dancing rob|Dancing rob]] 14:33, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 
 
 
----
 
 
 
Took out possession opinion ideas, as that is best for within the possession section.  Added title more reflective of the piece, and condensed the tools section to be more concise and less opinionated.  [[OgtheDim]] Nov 29 2005
 

Revision as of 13:16, 14 March 2006

Took out one opinion of what is needed attack wise to beat a certain level of defence. This discussion is best left in an opinion piece, and not in the main article. Added lots of potential link