Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rating"

From Hattrick
(revert)
Line 1: Line 1:
Took out one opinion of what is needed attack wise to beat a certain level of defence.  This discussion is best left in an opinion piece, and not in the main article.  Added lots of potential link
+
Took out one opinion of what is needed attack wise to beat a certain level of defence.  This discussion is best left in an opinion piece, and not in the main article.  Added lots of potential links.
 +
 
 +
---
 +
 
 +
Pages now exist for
 +
 
 +
attack ratings
 +
defence ratings
 +
 
 +
L / R / C defence
 +
L / R / C attack
 +
 
 +
any more needed?[[User:Dancing rob|Dancing rob]] 14:33, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
Took out possession opinion ideas, as that is best for within the possession section.  Added title more reflective of the piece, and condensed the tools section to be more concise and less opinionated.  [[OgtheDim]] Nov 29 2005

Revision as of 14:15, 14 March 2006

Took out one opinion of what is needed attack wise to beat a certain level of defence. This discussion is best left in an opinion piece, and not in the main article. Added lots of potential links.

---

Pages now exist for

attack ratings defence ratings

L / R / C defence L / R / C attack

any more needed?Dancing rob 14:33, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


Took out possession opinion ideas, as that is best for within the possession section. Added title more reflective of the piece, and condensed the tools section to be more concise and less opinionated. OgtheDim Nov 29 2005