Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rating"

From Hattrick
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Took out one opinion of what is needed attack wise to beat a certain level of defence.  This discussion is best left in an opinion piece, and not in the main article.  Added lots of potential links.
 
Took out one opinion of what is needed attack wise to beat a certain level of defence.  This discussion is best left in an opinion piece, and not in the main article.  Added lots of potential links.
 +
 +
---
 +
 +
Pages now exist for
 +
 +
attack ratings
 +
defence ratings
 +
 +
L / R / C defence
 +
L / R / C attack
 +
 +
any more needed?[[User:Dancing rob|Dancing rob]] 14:33, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:33, 28 November 2005

Took out one opinion of what is needed attack wise to beat a certain level of defence. This discussion is best left in an opinion piece, and not in the main article. Added lots of potential links.

---

Pages now exist for

attack ratings defence ratings

L / R / C defence L / R / C attack

any more needed?Dancing rob 14:33, 28 November 2005 (UTC)