Difference between revisions of "Talk:Skills"

From Hattrick
(page usage note)
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
Please try to keep the descriptions of skills on this page very short.  USe the individual skill page for detailed descriptions.  See [[Stamina]] for an example
 
Please try to keep the descriptions of skills on this page very short.  USe the individual skill page for detailed descriptions.  See [[Stamina]] for an example
 +
 +
----
 +
It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake?  Can someone revert?
 +
--[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:12, 19 January 2006

how about putting in information rather than just cold facts and lists like inform that anything below weak is worthless. a discussion on multi-skilled players and what constitutes a high secondary. Maybe a discussion on what counts as a very high skill in something. What level of skill is state of the art. when do wages become a real problem. etc

discussion about form, what is average form level, can you expect your players to be inadequate, passable or solid on average?


Serafimul: That would be nice. But if we are to extend those subjects maybe would be easier to split it in different pages. --- I don't think that making the font-size smaller will help anyone.

I agree that the wikipedia shouldn't just be a copy of the rules. I won't start working on this page at the moment, but I'd be glad if someone did. I'm working on the related topic subskills and would be glad if someone added a statement about the difference between the skill that is shown on the Hattrick page and the underlying skill of a player.


Generally happy with the content now, but the first paragraph needs work Dancing rob 23:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


Yes, I agree. However, by changing my sample you removed the c-skill aspect.....--psymon 10:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)


Please try to keep the descriptions of skills on this page very short. USe the individual skill page for detailed descriptions. See Stamina for an example


It looks like the whole page got blown away, since it's from someone without a login I presume that's a mistake? Can someone revert? --Mr Wednesday 17:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)