Talk, talk, talk! Do you have anything on your mind ment for my ears, please add it to this page.
Thanks for the italian links, i realized it soon, and updated them all :)
Sorry if this isn't the right place to write a message, i'm still not used with the wiki
Thx for kudos, to you too for your job at clubhouse + welcome here. Well, as you can see there is still a lot of articles that need to be updated or at least controlled if they're still accurate, especially the ones in the Category:Game Concepts. I'm looking myself at everything related to the countries. MOMOO does a lot on World Cups, I think he can need a helping hand. And anyway, it's a wiki, you'll always find room for improvments. Oh, and one last thing: you can move the article for your team in the main name space (i.e. to Boddingtons FC). Regards. --Mod-Karlthegreat 19:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC) P.S.: There's a template for my HT messages, I'll fix that in the Clubhouse article as soon as I've got some sleep, unless someone else does it.
- Yes, always place team articles in the main name space. I hope that all our guidelines tell that, if not then I need to fix 'em. Signature: you mean like this: --Mod-Karlthegreat 15:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC) ? if yes, use: --~~~~. The HT rules will be completely updated soon, so don't bother with changing the minor edits made recently (if there were, I don't recall if that's been the case). One thing that would also need more input and that is largely susceptible to be expanded is HTs on Global. Unfortunately I'm not really following Global English, so I can't provide many quotes from the HTs or flameron. --Mod-Karlthegreat 15:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Team#Teams by Region / Category:Clubs_by_country
huh? We have no more categories to sort teams by regions. All teams have their category like this: [[Category:Swedish Clubs]]. All country team categories are then sorted in [[Category:Clubs_by_country]]. Finally this is then the top of the category tree: Category:Clubs. Or am I simply not understanding your point? --Mod-Karlthegreat 15:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, I see, but I don't think that's a problem. The first one is in an article and a static version where we can add comments or other remarks or develop it even more if needed or possible and the other one's a part of the category tree. I think redundancy is fine there for the moment. Also 'cause the first one's a good way to get people to think "oh, it's possible to create an article for my team!" as the category-thingy isn't that obvious enough. --Mod-Karlthegreat 14:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)