Talk:Achievement Seeker Federation: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
case for proposed deletion |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should be deleted in my opinion because the fed no longer exists. I suppose a case could be made to keep it around for historical purposes, but it doesn't seem like a lot of work went into the page and it adds clutter to the federations category by keeping non-existent feds there. I would suggest deleting it of no one objects.--[[User:Sam a1027|Sam a1027]] 03:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | Should be deleted in my opinion because the fed no longer exists. I suppose a case could be made to keep it around for historical purposes, but it doesn't seem like a lot of work went into the page and it adds clutter to the federations category by keeping non-existent feds there. I would suggest deleting it of no one objects.--[[User:Sam a1027|Sam a1027]] 03:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I'm kind of against deleting anything that has (or once had) valid information. If it clutters, how about having a category for "Former federations" or something with a better name? We have had a small discussion in the [[Hattrick Wiki Federation]] about saving obsolete pages somehow as a historical reference. Any of our admin (Jhattara? :) have an opinion about this? --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 07:40, March 31, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:: I think the page should be kept, but with a notification that the federation doesn't exist anymore. --[[User:Jhattara|Jhattara]] 08:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: Agreed. It's just as for defunct teams and other things that are gone. --[[User:Mod-Karlthegreat|Mod-Karlthegreat]] 13:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::: Ok, it seems the consensus is to keep it. Can we take it out of the international federations category and put it in a former federations category or something?--[[User:Sam a1027|Sam a1027]] 04:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::: Yes, I would like that, as that was my initial suggestion/question above. :) --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 05:25, April 1, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::: I created couple of new categories and moved this article into there removing the delete proposal. --[[User:Jhattara|Jhattara]] 06:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::: Good work!--[[User:Sam a1027|Sam a1027]] 16:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:59, 1 April 2009
Should be deleted in my opinion because the fed no longer exists. I suppose a case could be made to keep it around for historical purposes, but it doesn't seem like a lot of work went into the page and it adds clutter to the federations category by keeping non-existent feds there. I would suggest deleting it of no one objects.--Sam a1027 03:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm kind of against deleting anything that has (or once had) valid information. If it clutters, how about having a category for "Former federations" or something with a better name? We have had a small discussion in the Hattrick Wiki Federation about saving obsolete pages somehow as a historical reference. Any of our admin (Jhattara? :) have an opinion about this? --EchoMan 07:40, March 31, 2009 (UTC)
- I think the page should be kept, but with a notification that the federation doesn't exist anymore. --Jhattara 08:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's just as for defunct teams and other things that are gone. --Mod-Karlthegreat 13:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, it seems the consensus is to keep it. Can we take it out of the international federations category and put it in a former federations category or something?--Sam a1027 04:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's just as for defunct teams and other things that are gone. --Mod-Karlthegreat 13:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think the page should be kept, but with a notification that the federation doesn't exist anymore. --Jhattara 08:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
