Talk:Sub Level: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Catalyst2950 (talk | contribs) m Typo! Darn case sensitivity! |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
One thing I'd like to discuss: In Switzerland we commonly use the term "subskill", but I often encounter the term "sub-level" on english pages. Is subskill a term only used in the German speaking countries? Should sub-level be the main page and subskill the redirect? | One thing I'd like to discuss: In Switzerland we commonly use the term "subskill", but I often encounter the term "sub-level" on english pages. Is subskill a term only used in the German speaking countries? Should sub-level be the main page and subskill the redirect? | ||
---- | |||
Subskill is commenly used too. I've also seen sub-level skill. ;-) | |||
I'd choose to let sub-level redirect to sub-skill. | |||
---- | |||
I think both terms are common and as long as one redirects to the other, we're fine. --[[User:Catalyst|Catalyst]] 23:40:33, 2005-11-27 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
Actually, we need to have [[Sub Level]] redirect to [[Sub-level]] now... --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 23:42, 27 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:43, 27 November 2005
One thing I'd like to discuss: In Switzerland we commonly use the term "subskill", but I often encounter the term "sub-level" on english pages. Is subskill a term only used in the German speaking countries? Should sub-level be the main page and subskill the redirect?
Subskill is commenly used too. I've also seen sub-level skill. ;-)
I'd choose to let sub-level redirect to sub-skill.
I think both terms are common and as long as one redirects to the other, we're fine. --Catalyst 23:40:33, 2005-11-27 (UTC)
Actually, we need to have Sub Level redirect to Sub-level now... --Catalyst2950 23:42, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
