Talk:Helper application: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Orestes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
EchoMan (talk | contribs)
m wrong article :)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
----
----


We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page.
We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page, as that seems like a double up
 
that said, why do we need to double up on descriptions that are allready provided on the external links.
 
- Orestes
 
----
 
How about we remove the "Freeware" spam and add some text saying "all applications are freeware, unless stated otherwise"? --[[User:Catalyst2950|Catalyst2950]] 13:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 
Why?

Latest revision as of 07:48, 16 August 2009

Feel free to add whatever helper applications you feel like, just make a note as to wether there freeware, shareware, or a trial based product, and that you add it to the right category


NB: Please refrain from posting free .tk adresses, and similar websites as they contain popup advertising, that may also contain malware

Wiki Pages.

There is a perfectly nice Foxtrick page, as well as pages for most of the other apps. I think they should be included in the page, my question to you is: How? Remove the external links in favour of internal ones? --GM-Lau 00:30, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


I think replace the external links with the internal links (which should link to the websites). This also justifies the need for the Categories: Helper Applications page. -- Wyatt


We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page, as that seems like a double up

that said, why do we need to double up on descriptions that are allready provided on the external links.

- Orestes


How about we remove the "Freeware" spam and add some text saying "all applications are freeware, unless stated otherwise"? --Catalyst2950 13:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Why?