Talk:Achievement Seeker Federation: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
case for proposed deletion |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should be deleted in my opinion because the fed no longer exists. I suppose a case could be made to keep it around for historical purposes, but it doesn't seem like a lot of work went into the page and it adds clutter to the federations category by keeping non-existent feds there. I would suggest deleting it of no one objects.--[[User:Sam a1027|Sam a1027]] 03:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | Should be deleted in my opinion because the fed no longer exists. I suppose a case could be made to keep it around for historical purposes, but it doesn't seem like a lot of work went into the page and it adds clutter to the federations category by keeping non-existent feds there. I would suggest deleting it of no one objects.--[[User:Sam a1027|Sam a1027]] 03:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I'm kind of against deleting anything that has (or once had) valid information. If it clutters, how about having a category for "Former federations" or something with a better name? We have had a small discussion in the [[Hattrick Wiki Federation]] about saving obsolete pages somehow as a historical reference. Any of our admin (Jhattara? :) have an opinion about this? --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 07:40, March 31, 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:40, 31 March 2009
Should be deleted in my opinion because the fed no longer exists. I suppose a case could be made to keep it around for historical purposes, but it doesn't seem like a lot of work went into the page and it adds clutter to the federations category by keeping non-existent feds there. I would suggest deleting it of no one objects.--Sam a1027 03:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm kind of against deleting anything that has (or once had) valid information. If it clutters, how about having a category for "Former federations" or something with a better name? We have had a small discussion in the Hattrick Wiki Federation about saving obsolete pages somehow as a historical reference. Any of our admin (Jhattara? :) have an opinion about this? --EchoMan 07:40, March 31, 2009 (UTC)
