Talk:Training: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Mr Wednesday (talk | contribs)
Add discussion for keeper training time.
Mr Wednesday (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:
----
----
Keeper training time: when I was training keepers, I found that I got pops every five weeks with a solid coach.  That's also been my observation for winger training, with the ''occasional'' exception where it's four weeks.  It's not frequent enough to call it less than five. If you are going to make a modification here, please provide a detailed counterexample. --[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 20:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Keeper training time: when I was training keepers, I found that I got pops every five weeks with a solid coach.  That's also been my observation for winger training, with the ''occasional'' exception where it's four weeks.  It's not frequent enough to call it less than five. If you are going to make a modification here, please provide a detailed counterexample. --[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 20:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
----
The most recent edit reduces the base training time for scoring from 7 weeks to 6 weeks.  Is there any basis for this, or should I revert? --[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 22:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:04, 25 July 2006

I have added when to cash in, and also a minor change to general, as general (although very minimally) does train keepers


Do alot of people not train till 21, might be worth mentioning that for balance. The bit on form about goalkeeping was there, just not very clear really. So I've tidyed it up so hopefully it is clear now that general trains goalkeeping and also that shooting trains set pieces


I feel personally that 21 is getting on a bit, so I put 20, but that said if the general consensus is 21 it can be changed


As team gets stronger, it becomes important to find the balance between trainable and playable players, therefore I'd say, that 21 y.o. are not too old for training.


If I could choose between training a passable scoring at the age of 17 and a brilliant scoring at the age of 21, then I would certainly chose the second... The second one earns immediatly at least 500k per level, while the 17 year old has to wait till he makes such profits per week...

Furthermore, I think that that should say that only counts for training primary skills, because when you train secondaries (like passing) you will very likely have older trainees, because such trainings are most lucrative when you train someone who already has a high primary skill.


With through passes, you can train 20 people, not 18. You could play twice 5-5-0.

you can indeed train 20 as you can with defensive position however since you can't gain formation experience I did not count them.

In reality each training type could well have a page to itself detailing all the ins and outs profit potential/formations to use/ways to balance winning games and using that type of training

Since training is so vital to hattrick it is no harm to strive to create a real definitive guide to all the options


What do you think about adding section with pros and cons of different training types? -- jablan

I agree completely but the differences between each choice is non trivial. To present all the facts I think it would be worthwhile having a page for each training type, except general :), outlining the amount of people doing it, potential profitability, cost of trainees, important secondaries, what formations it limits you to and other such considerations --Theschneer 19:16, 25 November 2005 (UTC)


Is that 16 weeks for Set Pieces trained with Shooting really correct? /Escogido#

with the training table - does anyone else feel there should be a more exact description of how training works, ie, the percentage per week numbers, or should we stick to the hattrix numbers? --Dancing rob



Dang....I can't do redirects worth beans in Libbyland, but the table sections need article links. (OgtheDim)


I have created a page for the crossing training type. Most links in the table now link to the skills, I think they should link to a training type page. In these pages could be the pros and cons, like in crossing training type.


An edit added a "huh?" about skilltrading -- it refers to buying a player who played for the selling club in a match that week a position covered by your training type. If he is on your club for the training update, he will get training, even though he didn't play for your club. --Mr Wednesday 02:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


Keeper training time: when I was training keepers, I found that I got pops every five weeks with a solid coach. That's also been my observation for winger training, with the occasional exception where it's four weeks. It's not frequent enough to call it less than five. If you are going to make a modification here, please provide a detailed counterexample. --Mr Wednesday 20:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


The most recent edit reduces the base training time for scoring from 7 weeks to 6 weeks. Is there any basis for this, or should I revert? --Mr Wednesday 22:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)