Talk:Tactics: Difference between revisions
Dancing rob (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Theschneer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Each tactic should have it's own page. They're an important aspect of the game | Each tactic should have it's own page. They're an important aspect of the game | ||
This tactics page could be a nice general tactic page | |||
explaining formations, player orders, tactics for training types, and match tactic orders | |||
and then link to far more detailed info on all the above on other pages like the 3-4-3 page or the FTW page etc | |||
Revision as of 17:44, 25 November 2005
What are we going to do with this in terms of page outlay - should each tactic get its own separate page or should they all stay below like they are now? We can't have both I suppose, but we do have both now.
I also dislike the links from abbreviations, which should be fixed as soon as we have made the decision above.
Shout people!
I took out the idea of AOW and AIM being dependent upon your series ladder level. 1, it's confusing. 2, it's not proven. Opinion is not a good idea in a Wiki, unless stated as such.
Each tactic should have it's own page. They're an important aspect of the game
This tactics page could be a nice general tactic page explaining formations, player orders, tactics for training types, and match tactic orders and then link to far more detailed info on all the above on other pages like the 3-4-3 page or the FTW page etc
