Template talk:Club.Info: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Gjankowski (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Catalyst (talk | contribs)
On Deleting Unused Templates
Line 2: Line 2:


Yes, you are right, but the true is that it does not looks so well (in my opinion of course) so i just create this template to use it on my team's page: [[Army.of.Darkness]] --[[Gjankowski|Gjankowski]] 23:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you are right, but the true is that it does not looks so well (in my opinion of course) so i just create this template to use it on my team's page: [[Army.of.Darkness]] --[[Gjankowski|Gjankowski]] 23:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
== On Deleting Unused Templates ==
It is my opinion that templates which are not in use but which are proposed templates (such as this one) should not be deleted.  However, to ensure that the proposed template is not deleted, the templates should be marked as a proposed template and should perhaps be created in the namespace of the author.  Let's not get deletion happy just yet... the wiki is still too young to be deleting things like this.
-[[User:Catalyst|Catalyst]] 01:06:55, 2007-10-25 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:06, 25 October 2007

There allready is a Template:Club so I don't think this one is necessary. --Rob184 23:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you are right, but the true is that it does not looks so well (in my opinion of course) so i just create this template to use it on my team's page: Army.of.Darkness --Gjankowski 23:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

On Deleting Unused Templates

It is my opinion that templates which are not in use but which are proposed templates (such as this one) should not be deleted. However, to ensure that the proposed template is not deleted, the templates should be marked as a proposed template and should perhaps be created in the namespace of the author. Let's not get deletion happy just yet... the wiki is still too young to be deleting things like this. -Catalyst 01:06:55, 2007-10-25 (UTC)