Template talk:Club.Info: Difference between revisions
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== On Deleting Unused Templates == | == On Deleting Unused Templates == | ||
It is my opinion that templates which are not in use but which are proposed templates (such as this one) should not be deleted. However, to ensure that the proposed template is not deleted, the templates should be marked as a proposed template and should perhaps be created in the namespace of the author. Let's not get deletion happy just yet... the wiki is still too young to be deleting things like this. For now I'm removing ARD. | It is my opinion that templates which are not in use but which are proposed templates (such as this one) should not be deleted. However, to ensure that the proposed template is not deleted, the templates should be marked as a proposed template and should perhaps be created in the namespace of the author. Let's not get deletion happy just yet... the wiki is still too young to be deleting things like this. For now, I'm removing ARD. | ||
-[[User:Catalyst|Catalyst]] 01:06:55, 2007-10-25 (UTC) | -[[User:Catalyst|Catalyst]] 01:06:55, 2007-10-25 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:08, 25 October 2007
There allready is a Template:Club so I don't think this one is necessary. --Rob184 23:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you are right, but the true is that it does not looks so well (in my opinion of course) so i just create this template to use it on my team's page: Army.of.Darkness --Gjankowski 23:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
On Deleting Unused Templates
It is my opinion that templates which are not in use but which are proposed templates (such as this one) should not be deleted. However, to ensure that the proposed template is not deleted, the templates should be marked as a proposed template and should perhaps be created in the namespace of the author. Let's not get deletion happy just yet... the wiki is still too young to be deleting things like this. For now, I'm removing ARD. -Catalyst 01:06:55, 2007-10-25 (UTC)
