Category talk:Hattrick workers: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Rob184 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
This category is quite large and still growing. I think it's a good idea to split this up in 2 new categories '''Current Hattrick workers''' and '''Former Hattrick workers'''. --[[User:Rob184|Rob184]] 23:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
This category is quite large and still growing. I think it's a good idea to split this up in 2 new categories '''Current Hattrick workers''' and '''Former Hattrick workers'''. --[[User:Rob184|Rob184]] 23:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
:For the moment this is the category for the current Hattrick workers only, so it would basically need only one new category: '''Former Hattrick workers'''. --[[User:Mod-Karlthegreat|Mod-Karlthegreat]] 13:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
:For the moment this is the category for the current Hattrick workers only, so it would basically need only one new category: '''Former Hattrick workers'''. --[[User:Mod-Karlthegreat|Mod-Karlthegreat]] 13:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
::That's good too. I saw at least 1 former HT worker in this category ([[-Lau-]]), that's why I did my comment. --[[User:Rob184|Rob184]] 14:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:09, 6 December 2007

Split

This category is quite large and still growing. I think it's a good idea to split this up in 2 new categories Current Hattrick workers and Former Hattrick workers. --Rob184 23:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

For the moment this is the category for the current Hattrick workers only, so it would basically need only one new category: Former Hattrick workers. --Mod-Karlthegreat 13:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
That's good too. I saw at least 1 former HT worker in this category (-Lau-), that's why I did my comment. --Rob184 14:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)