Category talk:Clubs: Difference between revisions
Dancing rob (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Septimusjm (talk | contribs) clubs |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Agree with Duno here [[User:Dancing rob|Dancing rob]] 13:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | Agree with Duno here [[User:Dancing rob|Dancing rob]] 13:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
== clubs == | |||
I think clubs is too big a category to limit in any way. The solution is to split off the "memorable" clubs. There's a similiar category the US [[:Category:Notable American Clubs]]. [[User:Septimusjm|Septimusjm]] 18:16, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:16, 30 November 2005
What should we do about this one? The list is full of non-memorable clubs, which is a hard to avoid problem. There is already a category for non-remarkable teams: Category:User Clubs, and its talk page Category_talk:User_Clubs. I think the issues are:
- remarkable vs non-remarkable teams - how to categorize them?
- divide by country - is it worth it?
Regarding the second issue, at this moment there is an Category:Clubs_by_country as well as subcategories under Category:Clubs. To get rid of all this, my suggestion is to leave Category:Clubs as a dummy category, and split its contents in Category:User Clubs and Category:Remarkable Clubs, adding subcategories for countries under each one. --duno7 13:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Agree with Duno here Dancing rob 13:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
clubs
I think clubs is too big a category to limit in any way. The solution is to split off the "memorable" clubs. There's a similiar category the US Category:Notable American Clubs. Septimusjm 18:16, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
