Category talk:Clubs: Difference between revisions
Septimusjm (talk | contribs) clubs |
CSM 03? |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I think clubs is too big a category to limit in any way. The solution is to split off the "memorable" clubs. There's a similiar category the US [[:Category:Notable American Clubs]]. [[User:Septimusjm|Septimusjm]] 18:16, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | I think clubs is too big a category to limit in any way. The solution is to split off the "memorable" clubs. There's a similiar category the US [[:Category:Notable American Clubs]]. [[User:Septimusjm|Septimusjm]] 18:16, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
== CSM 03? == | |||
What the hell... is that CSM 03 page embedded in the code or something? | |||
Latest revision as of 00:18, 18 January 2006
What should we do about this one? The list is full of non-memorable clubs, which is a hard to avoid problem. There is already a category for non-remarkable teams: Category:User Clubs, and its talk page Category_talk:User_Clubs. I think the issues are:
- remarkable vs non-remarkable teams - how to categorize them?
- divide by country - is it worth it?
Regarding the second issue, at this moment there is an Category:Clubs_by_country as well as subcategories under Category:Clubs. To get rid of all this, my suggestion is to leave Category:Clubs as a dummy category, and split its contents in Category:User Clubs and Category:Remarkable Clubs, adding subcategories for countries under each one. --duno7 13:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Agree with Duno here Dancing rob 13:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
clubs
I think clubs is too big a category to limit in any way. The solution is to split off the "memorable" clubs. There's a similiar category the US Category:Notable American Clubs. Septimusjm 18:16, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
CSM 03?
What the hell... is that CSM 03 page embedded in the code or something?
