Hattrick talk:Consensus: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Septimusjm (talk | contribs)
Mr Wednesday (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


PS, My vote for consensus is the "limited vote." Only users who have spent time in the Wiki could really understand what's best for the Wiki as a whole.--[[User:Septimusjm|septimusjm]] 20:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
PS, My vote for consensus is the "limited vote." Only users who have spent time in the Wiki could really understand what's best for the Wiki as a whole.--[[User:Septimusjm|septimusjm]] 20:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
I also think that open votes will not be the best option in most cases. --[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 22:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:09, 6 April 2006

Discuss

This is a proposed policy. Any additions or changes to the policy should be made through discussion so as to prevent any nasty edit wars. Since this is not yet a policy, it's going to be a bit difficult to actually establish a consensus on consensus :-). However, let's assume it's a policy for this discussion. Debate may occur on any or all parts of the policy, but I do ask that any changes you believe should be made be discussed here, unless of course they are grammatical, aesthetical, or for sake of clarity. Since this is a policy, I believe a vote is obligatory. However, free discussion and tweaking of the current model should occur first before we put the final version to a vote. -Catalyst 06:09:33, 2006-04-03 (UTC)


I suggested adding one more voting option: "Semi-open." All registered users, but no unregistered users, could vote.

Btw, I'm a little unsure what's supposed to be going on with our two projects pages right now? Should we arguing for/against? Proposing edits?

PS, My vote for consensus is the "limited vote." Only users who have spent time in the Wiki could really understand what's best for the Wiki as a whole.--septimusjm 20:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I also think that open votes will not be the best option in most cases. --Mr Wednesday 22:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)