Hattrick talk:Consensus: Difference between revisions
Septimusjm (talk | contribs) m →Discuss |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
PS, My vote for consensus is the "limited vote." Only users who have spent time in the Wiki could really understand what's best for the Wiki as a whole.--[[User:Septimusjm|septimusjm]] 20:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | PS, My vote for consensus is the "limited vote." Only users who have spent time in the Wiki could really understand what's best for the Wiki as a whole.--[[User:Septimusjm|septimusjm]] 20:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
*Basically the point of this is to discuss the policy and do whatever we can to get it to a "final version" which we will vote on (starting May 21st). So yes, proposing edits mostly. The argument for and against should be reserved for the voting period. -[[User:Catalyst|Catalyst]] 02:48:04, 2006-04-07 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
I also think that open votes will not be the best option in most cases. --[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 22:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | I also think that open votes will not be the best option in most cases. --[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 22:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:48, 7 April 2006
Discuss
This is a proposed policy. Any additions or changes to the policy should be made through discussion so as to prevent any nasty edit wars. Since this is not yet a policy, it's going to be a bit difficult to actually establish a consensus on consensus :-). However, let's assume it's a policy for this discussion. Debate may occur on any or all parts of the policy, but I do ask that any changes you believe should be made be discussed here, unless of course they are grammatical, aesthetical, or for sake of clarity. Since this is a policy, I believe a vote is obligatory. However, free discussion and tweaking of the current model should occur first before we put the final version to a vote. -Catalyst 06:09:33, 2006-04-03 (UTC)
I suggested adding one more voting option: "Semi-open." All registered users, but no unregistered users, could vote.
Btw, I'm a little unsure what's supposed to be going on with our two projects pages right now? Should we arguing for/against? Proposing edits?
PS, My vote for consensus is the "limited vote." Only users who have spent time in the Wiki could really understand what's best for the Wiki as a whole.--septimusjm 20:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Basically the point of this is to discuss the policy and do whatever we can to get it to a "final version" which we will vote on (starting May 21st). So yes, proposing edits mostly. The argument for and against should be reserved for the voting period. -Catalyst 02:48:04, 2006-04-07 (UTC)
I also think that open votes will not be the best option in most cases. --Mr Wednesday 22:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
