Talk:Walk Over: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Mr Wednesday (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Or even better, it's already been done. Perhaps this should be renamed to correct capitalization in the title? Or am I being picky at this point? [[User:Kc-jake|-- Jake]] 16:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | Or even better, it's already been done. Perhaps this should be renamed to correct capitalization in the title? Or am I being picky at this point? [[User:Kc-jake|-- Jake]] 16:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
: It's only an issue as far as links are concerned, I guess -- searching on "walk over" still takes you to the right page. Policy-wise, it would probably be appropriate to do. --[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 17:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:46, 18 August 2006
Shouldn't this be named "walkover" and not "walk over"? -- Jake 16:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- I would agree with the normal English usage, but note that the HT rules use two words (standing alone and hyphenated). I would assume that the use of two words here was to be consistent with that. A redirect for the "less preferred" choice would probably be in order. --Mr Wednesday 16:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Sounds like a plan. I'll make the redirect if you haven't already. -- Jake 16:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Or even better, it's already been done. Perhaps this should be renamed to correct capitalization in the title? Or am I being picky at this point? -- Jake 16:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's only an issue as far as links are concerned, I guess -- searching on "walk over" still takes you to the right page. Policy-wise, it would probably be appropriate to do. --Mr Wednesday 17:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
