Talk:Abbreviations: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
LA-Motto (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Duno7 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


I think, that we should explude abreviations like AFAIK, IMHO, LOL, etc. For those we can refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_slang
I think, that we should explude abreviations like AFAIK, IMHO, LOL, etc. For those we can refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_slang
----
I have a question regarding the inclusion of Federation acronyms in this list, should them be allowed? In my opinion they should be kept out of the list, since they are not used as widely as the "universal" abbreviations (WO, GM, MOD, FW, ...); and it would be hard to tell the line between a "know federation that enters this list" I also think abbreviations such as LOL, BTL, ROFL should not be included, since they are not specific to Hattrick.
I see this list as a list of '''HT-specific''' acronyms that are accepted by a '''the majority''' of HT-users.--[[User:Duno7|duno7]] 21:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
----

Revision as of 21:37, 25 November 2005

Please link the full name description, not the acronym.

I think, that we should explude abreviations like AFAIK, IMHO, LOL, etc. For those we can refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_slang



I have a question regarding the inclusion of Federation acronyms in this list, should them be allowed? In my opinion they should be kept out of the list, since they are not used as widely as the "universal" abbreviations (WO, GM, MOD, FW, ...); and it would be hard to tell the line between a "know federation that enters this list" I also think abbreviations such as LOL, BTL, ROFL should not be included, since they are not specific to Hattrick. I see this list as a list of HT-specific acronyms that are accepted by a the majority of HT-users.--duno7 21:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC)