Talk:Match of the Season

Just a bit of grammer changes and formatting.

I disagree, but I'm not disagree ;) I prefer MOTS and PIC -- Mightyzug

I prefer MotS over MOTS, do more people agree? --GM-Lau 15:40, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

---

I'm agree, as do I prefer PiC over PIC --ukelele 15:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

I've rephrased everything. Examples are confusing, and we should stick to a formal, easy to understand explanation. MotS is a possibility, of course, but I wouldn't use it as I've never actually seen people write that. --Catalyst2950 15:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Fine by me...I used a bit of inertia from the post before, but you made it much clearer. [OgtheDim]

I kind of disagree with LA-Motto's last changes. The examples will possibly lead people to believe that there's a less than one level increase in midfield rating (midfield level? what do we do with that?), and in fact, it's wrong. Even with flat-solid midfield (7.00), a MOTS would increase it to very low excellent (8.05). --Catalyst2950 15:58, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

I have kind of reverted back the changes. The explanation of how exactly TS influences midfield, what the default value is, etc, are left for a separate article on TS. This one deals with MOTS. However, I have added a remark that TS relates to midfield. If you insist on examples, don't mix them with this part of the article, but add headings and separate the content. --Catalyst2950 16:14, 26 November 2005 (UTC)