Hattrick talk:Copyrights

GFDL

It's the GFDL an accepted license for copyryghted work?

Most of the wikipedia images are under this licenses, and they are used im the countries and regions pages.

--Carlesmu 14:28, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

---

As long as the copyrightnotices are also copied then this is okay. I'm guessing they are.

2. VERBATIM COPYING

You may copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this License, the copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License applies to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that you add no other conditions whatsoever to those of this License. You may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies you make or distribute. However, you may accept compensation in exchange for copies. If you distribute a large enough number of copies you must also follow the conditions in section 3.

--GM-Lau 14:32, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

---

I agree, but I think the accepted licenses should be listed in the Hattrick:Copyrights page. When we create/modified a page there is this text:

You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Project:Copyrights for details). DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION!

But Project:Copyrights redirect to [[Hattick:Copyrights] and it is empty.

--Carlesmu 14:46, 27 November 2005 (UTC)