Category talk:Clubs: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*remarkable vs non-remarkable teams - how to categorize them? | *remarkable vs non-remarkable teams - how to categorize them? | ||
*divide by country - is it worth it? | *divide by country - is it worth it? | ||
Regarding the second issue, at this moment there is an [[:Category:Clubs_by_country]] as well as subcategories under [[:Category:Clubs]]. To get rid of all this, my suggestion is to leave [[:Category: | Regarding the second issue, at this moment there is an [[:Category:Clubs_by_country]] as well as subcategories under [[:Category:Clubs]]. To get rid of all this, my suggestion is to leave [[:Category:Clubs]] as a dummy category, and split its contents in [[:Category:User Clubs]] and [[:Category:Remarkable Clubs]], adding subcategories for countries under each one. --[[User:Duno7|duno7]] 13:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:49, 29 November 2005
What should we do about this one? The list is full of non-memorable clubs, which is a hard to avoid problem. There is already a category for non-remarkable teams: Category:User Clubs, and its talk page Category_talk:User_Clubs. I think the issues are:
- remarkable vs non-remarkable teams - how to categorize them?
- divide by country - is it worth it?
Regarding the second issue, at this moment there is an Category:Clubs_by_country as well as subcategories under Category:Clubs. To get rid of all this, my suggestion is to leave Category:Clubs as a dummy category, and split its contents in Category:User Clubs and Category:Remarkable Clubs, adding subcategories for countries under each one. --duno7 13:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
