Talk:Helper application: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page | We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page, as that seems like a double up | ||
- Orestes | |||
Revision as of 02:59, 30 November 2005
Feel free to add whatever helper applications you feel like, just make a note as to wether there freeware, shareware, or a trial based product, and that you add it to the right category
NB: Please refrain from posting free .tk adresses, and similar websites as they contain popup advertising, that may also contain malware
Wiki Pages.
There is a perfectly nice Foxtrick page, as well as pages for most of the other apps. I think they should be included in the page, my question to you is: How? Remove the external links in favour of internal ones? --GM-Lau 00:30, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
I think replace the external links with the internal links (which should link to the websites). This also justifies the need for the Categories: Helper Applications page. -- Wyatt
We can remove the external links in favour of internal ones, with a description of the program, and an external link. This would add an extra click, but also retain the external link. I think this soloution would better suit then the more information can be found here that we currently have in place on the page, as that seems like a double up
- Orestes
