Category talk:Newbie Tips: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I fixed a lot of formatting errors and typos; I also added the based_on_opinion template, since what was written is largely opinion. If anyone notices this same article somewhere else originating before the original date of this large article (today), delete this content immediately. While I disagree with some of the points made, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea to start an edit battle. So in the interest of keeping the peace, if anyone wants to make changes to the content (non-minor edits), here's the place to do it. [[User:Kc-jake|-- Jake]] 18:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC) | I fixed a lot of formatting errors and typos; I also added the based_on_opinion template, since what was written is largely opinion. If anyone notices this same article somewhere else originating before the original date of this large article (today), delete this content immediately. While I disagree with some of the points made, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea to start an edit battle. So in the interest of keeping the peace, if anyone wants to make changes to the content (non-minor edits), here's the place to do it. [[User:Kc-jake|-- Jake]] 18:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Is it appropriate to have this amount of content on a category page? We've already got at least a couple of newbie guide articles already, in the two ten principle approach pages. And that's not even getting into content issues -- setting aside matters of opinion, this content was clearly written before the current "certificate" program was put in place, because it doesn't mention basics like not being able to change your formation immediately. --[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 21:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:20, 24 July 2007
I fixed a lot of formatting errors and typos; I also added the based_on_opinion template, since what was written is largely opinion. If anyone notices this same article somewhere else originating before the original date of this large article (today), delete this content immediately. While I disagree with some of the points made, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea to start an edit battle. So in the interest of keeping the peace, if anyone wants to make changes to the content (non-minor edits), here's the place to do it. -- Jake 18:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Is it appropriate to have this amount of content on a category page? We've already got at least a couple of newbie guide articles already, in the two ten principle approach pages. And that's not even getting into content issues -- setting aside matters of opinion, this content was clearly written before the current "certificate" program was put in place, because it doesn't mention basics like not being able to change your formation immediately. --Mr Wednesday 21:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
