Passing Federation/Passing player prices: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Johanv314 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Para Para (talk | contribs)
m Redirected page to Passing player prices
Tag: New redirect
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Based on research}}
#redirect [[Passing player prices]]
 
== Under development ==
 
=== Average prices for players with passing ===
 
This little research reflects the avarage price of players calculated by the 'average price' tool in Mozilla Firefox using the transfer compare of Hattrick.  Please take into account that prices are changing rapidly and that the figures mentioned are avarage figures not taking into account specialties, nationality and other specific players characteristics. 
 
Player age was 23.
 
The research handles four main types of players: scorers, wingers, playmakers and defenders; each in combination with levels of passing.
 
After that, player prices have been update by the sales prices of members of the Passing Fed.
 
 
 
=== Scoring and Passing ===
This research has been started between 5 October 2006 and 15 October 2006.
{|
|+ '''Statistics on player prices scoring and passing'''
!width="100"|Scoring\Passing
!width="100"|Weak
!width="100"|Inadequate
!width="100"|Passible
!width="100"|Solid
!width="100"|Excellent
!width="100"|Formidable
!width="100"|Outstanding
!width="100"|Brilliant
!width="100"|Magnificent
|-align="center"
| '''Excellent'''
|171 000
|297 000
|322 240
|415 500
|558 000
|682 500
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Formidable'''
|490 000
|627 500
|704 000
|775 500
|957 333
|896 667
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Outstanding'''
|685 000
|774 000
|945 000
|1 053 000
|1 240 000
|1 505 000
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Brilliant'''
|855 000
|1 060 000
|1 270 000
|1 390 000
|1 700 000
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Magnificent'''
|1 240 000
|1 270 000
|1 510 000
|1 700 000
|1 920 000
|NA
|2 540 000
|NA
|NA
|}
 
 
 
=== Winger and Passing ===
This research has been started with TC between 1 and 4 December 2006. Playmaking and defending were taking maximum to be inadequate.  In an earlier research, requiring defending and playmaking both to be between weak and inadequate, resulted in almost no hits, making the research invaluable.
Please also note that TC frequently did not give any similar players.
 
{|
|+ '''Statistics on player prices winger and passing'''
!width="100"|Winger\Passing
!width="100"|Weak
!width="100"|Inadequate
!width="100"|Passible
!width="100"|Solid
!width="100"|Excellent
!width="100"|Formidable
!width="100"|Outstanding
!width="100"|Brilliant
!width="100"|Magnificent
|-align="center"
| '''Excellent'''
|140 000
|270 000
|350 000
|395 000
|NA
|555 555
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Formidable'''
|350 000
|510 000
|560 000
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Outstanding'''
|NA
|NA
|680 000
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Brilliant'''
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Magnificent'''
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|}
 
=== Playmaking and Passing ===
 
This research has been started with TC between 4 and 8 December 2006.
Defending is taking maximum to be weak.  Stamina excellent or formidable.
 
{|
|+ '''Statistics on player prices playmaking and passing'''
!width="100"|Playmaking\Passing
!width="100"|Weak
!width="100"|Inadequate
!width="100"|Passible
!width="100"|Solid
!width="100"|Excellent
!width="100"|Formidable
!width="100"|Outstanding
!width="100"|Brilliant
!width="100"|Magnificent
|-align="center"
| '''Excellent'''
|110 000
|180 000
|255 000
|375 000
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Formidable'''
|285 000
|370 000
|515 000
|660 000
|765 000
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Outstanding'''
|485 000
|600 000
|750 000
|885 000
|1 160 000
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Brilliant'''
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Magnificent'''
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|}
 
=== Defending and Passing ===
 
{|
|+ '''Statistics on player prices defending and passing'''
!width="100"|Defending\Passing
!width="100"|Weak
!width="100"|Inadequate
!width="100"|Passible
!width="100"|Solid
!width="100"|Excellent
!width="100"|Formidable
!width="100"|Outstanding
!width="100"|Brilliant
!width="100"|Magnificent
|-align="center"
| '''Excellent'''
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Formidable'''
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Outstanding'''
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Brilliant'''
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|-align="center"
| '''Magnificent'''
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|NA
|}

Latest revision as of 08:48, 8 April 2021