TSI overflow: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Interwiki/TSI overflow}} | |||
'''TSI overflow''' is a [[bug]] that is related to limitations in the [[Hattrick]] [[database]]. | |||
After reaching divinity, a player can be trained even further because there is no cap at divine at all. And TSI can actually go to 2 million+, and then it restarts at 0. | After reaching divinity, a player can be trained even further because there is no cap at divine at all. And TSI can actually go to 2 million+, and then it restarts at 0. | ||
TSI-data is stored in a 32 bit number, this means that you can reach up to 2^31 - 1 numbers. <br> | TSI-data is stored in a 32 bit number, this means that you can reach up to 2^31 - 1 numbers. <br> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:Game Concepts]] | [[Category:Game Concepts]] | ||
[[Category:Hattrick]] | |||
Latest revision as of 22:54, 18 June 2012
TSI overflow is a bug that is related to limitations in the Hattrick database.
After reaching divinity, a player can be trained even further because there is no cap at divine at all. And TSI can actually go to 2 million+, and then it restarts at 0.
TSI-data is stored in a 32 bit number, this means that you can reach up to 2^31 - 1 numbers.
This equals the astronomical amount of
- "2.147.483.648"
Because TSI is always a multiplicant of 1.000(due to the old player value system), the highest number you can reach is "2.147.483" .
This number would be stored as:
- "1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111" (binary),
- "1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111.1111" (binary),
if you add 1 to this number, the result is
- "1.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000" (binary)
- "1.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000" (binary)
Since TSI is stored in 32-bits, only the "0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000" part is stored, leaving "0" in decimal.
Obviously the developers never meant for this to happen. The first player, to get “TSI overflow” was Herman Vooijs.
