|
|
| (18 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ===What is it?===
| | #redirect [[Norwegian tactic]] |
| | |
| Norwegian tactic (also called simply "Norway" or "Norge") concentrates on boosting [[midfield]] and/or [[attack]] at expense of [[defence]]. The idea behind this tactics is simple as inequality: 5 > (10-6), meaning: if you'll get 6 out of 10 chances there are in every match, and you will score from at least 5 of them, you will win the match even if your opponent scores from every chance he gets. In other words, if your possesion is big enough to get you 6 chances in a match and your attacks are good enough to convert those chances into goals, you need no defence at all. So if giving up defence will give you such midfield and attacks, then it is a logical thing to do.
| |
| | |
| ===Why is it called "Norwegian?"===
| |
| | |
| The name of this tactic derives from famous final match (MatchID: 14287675) of [[World Cup]] IV, played on 29.02.2004, in which [[Norge|Norway]] beat [[Sverige|Sweden]] 4-2 (it was the only [[World Cup]] not won by Sweden so far). Norwegian [[National Teams|NT]] coach [[Snylte]] used the following [[line-up]]:
| |
| | |
| {{Line-up|
| |
| title = Norway gold medal line-up|
| |
| gk = GK |
| |
| wb_right = WB off|
| |
| cd_right = CD off|
| |
| cd_left = CD off|
| |
| wb_left = exIM |
| |
| w_right = W off|
| |
| im_right = IM off|
| |
| im_left = IM off|
| |
| w_left = WTM |
| |
| f_right = FO |
| |
| f_left = FO |
| |
| }}
| |
| | |
| | |
| This was in reality not the first match in which Norwegian tactic was used, only the most famous one. The oldest Norwegian tactic matches I know, were played on 29.10.2003 (friendly, MatchID: 9958212) and 12.11.2003 (cup, MatchID: 12860969) - 4 months before the World Cup final - and there are probably even older ones (please submit them if you find them).
| |
| | |
| ===Norwegian tactic vs. all out tactic===
| |
| | |
| Norwegian tactic is often mistaken with "classic" all out tactic, which concentrates on boosting midfield (possesion), even at expense of attack (for example playing both wingers toward middle), but they're really not the same. | |
| | |
| | |
| {| align="center" border="1"
| |
| |- align="left"
| |
| |
| |
| | Norwegian tactic
| |
| | all out tactic
| |
| |- align="left"
| |
| | purpose
| |
| | align="left" width="400px" |
| |
| {| border="0"
| |
| | gain at least 6 chances, score at least 5
| |
| |}
| |
| | align="left" width="400px" |
| |
| {| border="0"
| |
| | gain all the chances in the game
| |
| |}
| |
| |- align="left"
| |
| | the idea
| |
| | if you score 5 goals while opponent can only score 4, you need no defence, you'll win anyway
| |
| | if you gain all the chances in the game the opponent won't score and with so many chances you must score something even with weak attack
| |
| |- align="left"
| |
| | means used
| |
| | relative to opponent's stats; possesion >59% (at least >55%), attacks (at least central attack or both wings) equal or stronger then opponent's defences
| |
| | extremly high midfield
| |
| |- align="left"
| |
| | lineups used
| |
| | [[3-5-2]], [[3-4-3]], ([[2-5-3]])
| |
| | [[3-5-2]], ([[2-5-3]])
| |
| |- align="left"
| |
| | tactics used
| |
| | [[AIM]], [[AOW]], [[normal]]
| |
| | [[AIM]]
| |
| |- align="left"
| |
| | players used
| |
| | 3 or 2 midfielders, wingers off or TM, 1 or 2 CD off, 1 or 2 Wb off
| |
| | 3 midfielders, 2 wingers TM, 2 CD off, WB doesn't really matter
| |
| |- align="left"
| |
| | counter tactics
| |
| | align="left" width="400px" |
| |
| {| border="0"
| |
| |-
| |
| | a) strong midfield (possesion >44%) with central defence (if opponent is playing AIM) or both wing defences (if AOW/normal) stronger then opponents attacks
| |
| |-
| |
| | b) all defences much, much stronger then his attacks, CA
| |
| |}
| |
| | boosting central defence, CA and/or possesion >39%
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| ===Effectiveness===
| |
| | |
| Even if after the use of this tactics there were changes in the game engine that increased the importance of defending, it is still used [[All out tactics]].
| |
| | |
| | |
| [[Category:Tactics]]
| |
