Help talk:Editing: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Broughy1322 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm going to move some of the editing examples on [[Hattrick:Content]] to here. | I'm going to move some of the editing examples on [[Hattrick:Content]] to here. | ||
: Done. Some sections moved to new pages. Should be reviwered de links (most of them are for the original Wikipedia (some of the changed to Hattrick:). --[[User:Carlesmu|carlesmu]] 17:18, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | : Done. Some sections moved to new pages. Should be reviwered de links (most of them are for the original Wikipedia (some of the changed to Hattrick:). --[[User:Carlesmu|carlesmu]] 17:18, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
A lot of useful stuff for newbie editors has been lost. | |||
Like...doing categories, stubs, redirects. | |||
Frankly, this section is too advanced and doesn't have much that is useful for most editors. | |||
---- | |||
It isn't lost, it has to be written. --[[User:Carlesmu|carlesmu]] 10:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
== Help:Header still in TOC== | |||
"3.4.2 This header has the h4 font, but is NOT in the Table of Contents" | |||
Err, yes it is. This clearly doesn't work. [[User:Broughy1322|Broughy1322]] 22:15, 18 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:15, 18 September 2010
Help:foo organization
I'm going to move some of the editing examples on Hattrick:Content to here.
- Done. Some sections moved to new pages. Should be reviwered de links (most of them are for the original Wikipedia (some of the changed to Hattrick:). --carlesmu 17:18, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
A lot of useful stuff for newbie editors has been lost.
Like...doing categories, stubs, redirects.
Frankly, this section is too advanced and doesn't have much that is useful for most editors.
It isn't lost, it has to be written. --carlesmu 10:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Help:Header still in TOC
"3.4.2 This header has the h4 font, but is NOT in the Table of Contents" Err, yes it is. This clearly doesn't work. Broughy1322 22:15, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
